Question: Do you think that MW2 was better than Black Ops? Cause I've heard a lot of people say that it is. Personally, I could definitely tell the difference as soon as I played Black Ops because it just felt different, you know? Like shooting a gun with those gun mechanics was just weird at first. Plus on campaign, the whole schizophrenia, "I'm seeing numbers" thing was just such a strange storyline. I'm not saying Black Ops is bad, since it's not like I play hard core or anything, it's usually just me on random rainy days or weekends when I have nothing to do that I sit down and play Team Deathmatch or Domination or whatever. So yeah, I was just curious. I play on PS3 if that means anything to you.
Black ops has many problems, but it's still better then MW2 as far as the online goes. I do not miss One Man Army, Danger Close, Commando, Tac Nukes and just all the hackers that were in the game. Infinity Ward didn't give a crap about patching anything, the care package glitch for example was in the game for months after everyone knew about it. Treyarch patches their glitches pretty quick. Even though it's kinda a bummer in zombies, at least they care about fair game play. MW2 had the potential to be a better game then it was. I do sometimes miss my golden intervention, but I realize how unrealistic quick scoping is. If you want a more balanced game, play black ops. If you want infinite noobtubes and quickscoping, play Mw2.
COD timeline(COD4-present): COD 4 was revolutionary. Waw... smh... MW2 is the game to play if you want to have fun abusing the game. Not to be taken too seriously. Black Ops is the most balanced COD game to date(IMO), but it's not perfect. Can be played more seriously. It's an alright game.
