Chain of Memories Which did you perfer?

I liked Riku's story more. Sora's was WAY too hard and took forever to finish

 

i would say riku because if u put both stories together they dont add up. Example:in the end where sora has to fight whats his name riku was there, but in riku`s story he was never there only his copy. that is all i have to say

 

Riku's, because you get to use Soul Eater and no stupid tutorals. It would be cool if the real Riku met up with Sora and battled because Riku was mistaken for his clone.

 

I perfered Sora's Story because you can change his deck.

 

i liked rikus much better cause u can transome form in to his dark form:D

 

I definetely liked Sora's much better then Riku's. It felt like just playing kingdom Hearts again, but with a different story, like Oogie Boogie. Riku's was jst the same as Sora's, so it isn't as exciting. So I definetely liked Sora's better.

 

Riku's story, here are my reasons,
Reason 1: YOU PLAY AS RIKU!!!
Reason 2: Dark mode was cool
Reason 3: It had the ultimate friend card, King Mickey.
Reasons 4-169: YOU PLAY AS RIKU!!!
Reason 170: You didn't have any story gaps. In Sora's story, I was wondering how Vexen got Riku's data for the Riku Replica.
Reason 171: The worlds were simple, a short world and a boss fight (in most worlds)

Reasons I didn't like Sora's story:
Reason 1: Story gaps
Reason 2: Too many cards, (I button bash in CoM, and I might accidentaly summon Bambi or something)
Reason 3: Sora doesn't jump as high or run as fast as Riku
Reason 4: The worlds were too complicated, it was unpredictable

Those are my reasons

 

I liked Sora's story more, because it had more cutscenes. With Reverse/Rebirth, it seemed like you were just going through all of the worlds and beating bosses; it was very tedious. But I like Riku's ending credits more.

 

i liked both. they were both good in their own way

 

I like Sora's story better cause:
- More strategy and actually makes you think what's next
- More worlds to go back to
- More cards that actually gives you treasures
- There's treasure
- You actually have more Abilities, not just slashing around.
- You can actually change your deck
- you roll, not dash
- Some boses look harder than Riku's since Riku has a closed deck, it's easier to strategize with his deck, rather than Sora's that, you can mix it up to find best Strategies for the boss, which takes you a long time to finish
- Has a longer game lifespan

Anythin else? Got it memorized?

 

I really liked the hack-and-slash of riku's story.
I thought it was alot more fun overall than Sora's.
But there is somethin that I like in Sora's more....it has a better story....

 

I would have to say Riku, hands down. I mean...his story is much more darker than Sora's and much more...sophisticated.

 

I'd say Sora's.

It was funnererer.

And it wasn't tedious like Riku's. >_> xD

 

I like Sora's more. It seemed more KHy. :)

 

Meh...I'd agree..somewhat...

But you have to admit, Sora's story wasn't fully KH without Riku's. xD

I mean..after beating Sora's half there was like an emptiness in the game..

That's when I was like: "HOLY CRAP I CAN PLAY AS RIKU! =O" and filled that in. xD

 

Heh.. I felt the Riku's story first quite unoffical because the strange reloading system and stuff like that..
Yes, I prefer Sora-mode...

Teehee in Sora mode I used to make an mass-kill deck as an enemy-killer deck :D:D Mushu + Fire + Fire = FUN