And the nameless. Took the HQ pictures that NYTimes got of these guys and made a sig. Kinda tall, but it was necessary imo... V1 V2
Pretty hawt, but I don't really see a difference between V1 and V2. I like the effects and shiz, but the smaller text could be better. Stock is a little confusing, but I like it.
V1 has a slightly lighter shade of blue as the shadow. And it's not as contrasted (it looked more noticeable in photoshop -_-; ). I should fix that text. Thanks for the CnC. :)
Rather monotone and the stock looks LQ, if you want I'll PM you a few ways how to improve the quality and remove the grainyness, Topaz is the most simple way (which some elitist ******s on KHI don't know, but still claim that Topaz is **** >.> ), you can get a free 30 day trial for it on several sites, just google it. Also size, it is too big to be an LP and too small to be an tag. Just in case you wanted to make an LP out of this, a little advice, don't make LP's the same way you make tags.
Mhm, I was really just making a big tag. It was mostly experiment so I understand it didn't go so well. And the stock already had graininess to begin with. The mask/skin specifically. The rest of it was my doing. xD; I'm going to fix that anyway. Thanks for the crit. Also, welcome, from KHI! :'D
