Yet he is also a spider. Therfore your statement is irrlevent from a animal who seems to have fused with either a Spider or a Panda and named themselves "Spider Panda". Thus pissing the Panda off into question of why his name isn't "Panda Spider". This is my failed impersonation at What? D:
Just because the creature has the name "Spider Panda" does not necessarily mean it can be a genetic cross between a spider and panda. Though the panda is a separate species of bear on it's own, the Spider Panda could simply be a name for a different breed of panda, preferably with certain characteristics that give it the name "Spider Panda".
Ah, but such words can be proven false with action. Do you have proof that animals named "Spider Panda" or "Panda Spider" CAN'T spin webs? Or do you have proof that our new species the "Spider Panda" is simply a normal panda that was named from the internet? My good sir this is madness beyond all damned belief. We can agree to which "Spider Panda" could possibly be a genetic cross or a breed of panda renamed. Sir, shall we perform our test? Fuckdammit I know I spelled several things wrong. CAN YA BLAME ME FOR SCREWING OVER MY GRAMMAR WITH DEALING WITH WHAT? CAN YOU?
Use logic. First of all, judging from the reactions from panda mating attempts, it is hard for them to mate with their own species, let alone small arachnids. Therefore, it rules out the possibility of pandas spinning webs. I need no proof of Spider Pandas existing, it is simply physically and biologically impossible. There is no need for a test, good sir. There are more chances of a breed of panda being named "Spider Panda" based on the characteristics of its actions and personality than its biological differences.
There should be 2 question marks after the word What, as one if part of his name and 2 is punctuation.
