Digital Art Naruto Sig (A bit dark)

Discussion in 'Arts & Graphics' started by Anderson, Feb 3, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Anderson (☞゚∀゚)☞ You've lost the game.

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2006
    Location:
    Mt. Silver
    65
    [​IMG]

    What I need most are some text advice.
    Don't be harsh whatsoever.
     
  2. Roxas OG

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cin's basement
    192
    I'm not going to be harsh, because I like it!

    I think the dark works well in the sig.

    8.5/10.
     
  3. Cody Chaser

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Location:
    XBL: Chug That Estus
    132
    I don't like the font.....
    I'll give it a 7.5/10
     
  4. Sanya Orussia’s 586th Fighter Regiment

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Hinamizawa
    735
    Dude that came out nice! But yeh, perhaps diffrent text :/ 8.7/10
     
  5. Cin Derp Derp Derp Derp Derp Derp Derp Derp Derp Derp

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Location:
    :uoıʇɐɔo1
    241
    Text = BAD

    One thing to keep in mind with text is, never have too much. It's a much better idea to only have a few words. Too much takes up a ton of room and makes the sig look horrible.

    Also, a simple font is always the way to go. Never get too fancy or complicated because it often ruins the sig.

    One more thing is, never have the text stick out more then the focal point, which in this case if Naruto.

    Overall, 6/10
     
  6. Akio Traverse Town Homebody

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Location:
    For those of you who know.... you know... =P
    1
    146
    I have to agree with Cin. Though it is a good job, the text just draws all of the attention away from the render and the sig itself suffers. If you have noticed, a lot of sigs that have tons text usually have most of it small, and the focal text large. There is nothing wrong with your sig besides the text, so I'll give it a 7/10 since it did turn out pretty good.
     
  7. Inasuma "pumpkin"

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Location:
    Indigo Plateau
    277
    This is probably one of the only times I find rating necessary.

    3/10

    (This is where there constructive criticism comes)

    The text doesn't go good here at all. It's slapped on and simple. No editing whatsoever, from what I can tell. The colour white isn't a necessary colour here. More like a higher shade of blue would make more sense.. The render, is blended in a bit. But it's just under a layer of clouds. No relevance to the sig there, at all...

    And finally, the BG. It's good, but it has no main purpose. It's mainly a blue layer with brush-layers on-top. Which is basic..so I don't really care so much. xD

    Keep at it. Read up on some tut's. :)
     
  8. Axel Chaser

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Location:
    Partying, making tags and Staring at the Sun.
    33
    This is where I don't agree too much. I think that if the text wasn't white adn instead blended more with the background, it might look good and flow well with such a background. Of course you could also change the backgorund by adding light effects but it looks like the sig is during the night sso I like the bg.
    Also about the text....well I think you should follow most Cin's advice about it.:)
    Overall 7/10
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.