Implemented Making it so rep is no longer anonymous

Discussion in 'Feedback & Assistance' started by La Sofa, Oct 16, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. kitty_mckechnie I want to hug you like big fuzzy Siberian bear!

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    2,230
    That would cause further, needless arguments. The whole point of the rep system is that it is anonymous. If someone feels they were derepped for no reason then they take it up with staff. It'd be askin' for trouble otherwise. =/
     
  2. Sora March Twilight Town Denizen

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    Location:
    A band hallway. TRUMPETS!!!
    28
    297
    But if they were drepped then they would kinda need to let the staff know who it was wouldn't they? So they can monitor the conversation that caused the needless derep?
     
  3. kitty_mckechnie I want to hug you like big fuzzy Siberian bear!

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    2,230
    The user that was derepped wouldn't need to know. They would want to know but it wouldn't be required if staff were dealin' with it. If members knew who derepped 'em then that member would derep in return. It would happen. Plus, staff cannot monitor conversations on msn n' such. It'd be more problematic to have such an option.
     
  4. JazzsVideos Gummi Ship Junkie

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Location:
    USA
    15
    312
    Hmmm this seems like a pretty good idea to me...
     
  5. Catch the Rain As the world falls down ♥

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Location:
    The Labyrinth
    790
    It wont be happening.

    For one thing, nobody signs a positive rep with someone else's name, that is just weird o_O

    For another reason, even if a member does de-rep another and leave a different name (which yes, does happen), the staff can check it out and despite what some members thinks, we can see who reps who,members who are found to be doing that are dealt with accordingly.

    It just seems like a huge mess around for little point. Sorry.

    ~Locked~
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.