Mafia [Mafia] The Book of Names ~ GAME OVER (MAFIA WINS)

Almost forgot to ##Unvote Spike. His alibi apparently checks out, considering his recent activity on both games. I don't want to policy lynch someone who's given a reasonable explanaition for not posting. Of course he could still very well be Mafia, but his particular innactivity has shown itself to be no longer something we should take as the sole motive for his lynching.

I'd really be more interested in hearing from the folks that didn't do anything aside from just checking in. That's what I call real innactivity, as in "not acting constructively" rather than simply "not posting".

Off the top of my head are @Moksha and @KeyToTruth12 but perhaps they could prove me wrong.

 

I'll keep my vote on Spike for now. Like you said, he could still be mafia and I just want to keep the pressure on. There's still plenty of time left in the day.

 

What more do you want from me. There really isn't all that much to go off on soon checking in is pretty much all I can do at this point.

 

You can offer your thoughts, theories, or opinions if you have any. Even if they're minor, it still helps.

 

And I have none of those at the moment, of course i also haven't put all that much effort to come up with anytime

 

[DOUBLEPOST=1416375069][/DOUBLEPOST]Oops, sorry.

"I don't really have anything to say at the moment."

That's what I want to say in the above post.

 

I follow what you're saying but bare in mind there is currently 5 hours until deadline. We still have a soft lynch on Spike but if we want to switch, we'll have to decide on a new target and move fast. We can't afford to waste any time. I believe Moksha, Cat, Calxiyn, al215 and me (:() are all the people who currently have votes other than Spike.

Oh, also I must apologise but I'm not going to be around much after this post before deadline.[DOUBLEPOST=1416424079][/DOUBLEPOST]Goddammit, that wasn't meant to be a smiley face, it was meant to be a sad one, I'm not really happy I've been voted for. Sometimes the no editing rule is annoying.

 

I'm really not so happy about lynching Spike. I know we're only on the first day and that our lynch is going to be, for the most part, based on no evidence but it's annoying to know that we're not going to to learn anything of substance by the end of today.

I believe that Spike is only at the threshold for a soft-lynch and changing my vote may put us in danger of a no-lynch. That said, if it were safe to do so, I would change my vote to either Moksha or Key2truth.

 

##Vote: Moksha

Sorry, pal. Nothing personal, I'm just not seeing any improvement from you, since you're displaying basically the same behavior from last time all over again. Town or Mafia, blatant disinterest is not helpful -- and I should really hope it's the latter.

 

Okay, so if Spike is considered to be a poor choice for a Lynch, then that leaves us in a position where we should select a different lynch target. Also, it seems kind of harsh to lynch him given that he's has been legitimately unable to post, and so we haven't really given him a chance to develop. If the inactivity continues then it may be worth a policy lynch, but we should also account for the fact that through his death, we will achieve very, very little as has been pointed out. As such, we are left with the choice of two other votes that are equally high, and those are on Cat and Calxiyn.

Personally, I'm not in the voting for Cal camp. She's provided some useful insight so far and seems to have a couple of ideas for us and may yet prove to be a steady source of useful information. I get more of a Town vibe from her, so I would not be in favour of lynching her.

On the other hand, for me Cat is the preferred target if we are not killing Spike. It's not about the random vote on me or anything, I simply just don't get much of a vibe at all from you whereas I get more of a town one from Cal. Since Cat has already made some accusations depending on the alignment, we may get some insight into the alignments of our other players.

Or we could try Moksha. I mean, that's not a bad choice but I feel like we should go for someone that will give us something, and with the two votes already on Cat we reduce the chance of a no lynch as a result of unvoting. I do however agree with you Judge that Moksha's performance can be improved, so I think that if none is shown then it may be practical to follow up with a lynch tomorrow if no better information comes out. We may be able to garner more information from Moksha's death later based on tomorrow's actions.

##Unvote: Spike

##Vote: Cat

 

I need a votal up in here, lol. @Midnight Star you mention that Moksha has a vote on him (other than Judge) but I don't see it. Are you sure? Nevertheless, I will join Judge and vote for him.

##Vote: Moksha

I will keep my eye on Cat and would consider consolidating on her if we're still faced with a no-lynch closer to the deadline, but I'm hesitant to vote for her just now as I'd rather not vote based on 'vibes' at this point.[DOUBLEPOST=1416431259][/DOUBLEPOST]

Forgot to ##Unvote: Spike[DOUBLEPOST=1416431293][/DOUBLEPOST](why did i reply to myself)

 

So, so far the votes are:

• al215 - 1 (Cat)
• Calxiyn - 2 (KeyToTruth12, Spike)
• Moksha - 2 (Judge Sunrose, Mish)
• Spike - 2 (Moksha, Trigger)
• Cat - 3 (Risky Biznu, Calxiyn, al215)

right? It's what I got from the last votal post, then getting the new stuff.

Also, Cat doesn't seem like mafia to me, though. Actually, nobody's done anything to make me think evil so far, except maybe tummer. He voted for Cat for a silly reason, and hasn't unvoted her since.
...That probably doesn't sound like a good reason to suspect him, but it's all I've got.

 

Dusk Votal

• Calxiyn - 2 (KeyToTruth12, Spike)
• al215 - 1 (Cat)
• Spike - 2 (Moksha, Trigger)
• Cat - 3 (Risky Biznu, Calxiyn, al215)
• Moksha - 2 (Judge Sunrose, Mish)

With 12 left alive, it takes 7 to lynch and 4 to soft-lynch. Day ends in approximately 2.5 hours.

 

Wow, this has quickly escalated. Anyways, for me the most mafia-person would be either Judge Sunrose and Moksha.
I'll list my reasons why when I get back for school.

 

That's just because I'm a douche to the people I care about. Ask Cat if you don't believe me.

 

Ok, but that doesn't really change anything.

 

I was wrong, I apologise, I have an excel document of all the votes people make and I hadn't linked al215's unvote for Moksha. Also am on here in a rush so don't have time to do anything else.

 

@Risky Biznu please provide real reasons for voting... we're past the joking and ice breaking stage of the game.

##Unvote: Spike

It's clear we won't be getting anything from Spike right now, and I'm not too inclined to believe he's mafia just yet.

##Vote: Moksha

Their blatant disinterest worries me, it makes me feel as if they're trying to say as little as possible to avoid giving away anything.

 

There's a different between disinterest and lack of evidence to make any solid reasoning, something you guys fail to understand. Instead of spouting random and untrue things this early on which would likely backfire on me, I'm being quiet until something that sticks out to me pops out, which aside from the overall wishy washy ness of voting for Spike there's nothing. All you guys are doing is basically waiting til the deadline to that questioning vote and since I have little plans on changing my votes, why should I follow along with the ones that are.

 

You flat out said that you haven't put that much effort to come up with anything. That sounds like disinterest to me.