Cloverfield [warning:spoilers]

The monster wasn't even Godzilla.

I didn't say it ate whole whales, I said it eats parts of them and leaves the bodies.

 

Actually, yes I consider myself one, maybe you thought it was crap but I didn't, personalyy I really didn't like Cloverfield that much but you love it, point is people are different.

true it could cash it's food away, and that may work for it..hmmm...

Glad you agree.

No one ever said it was Godzilla.

:/ animals arn't like that, the only thing in the entire world that's like that is Humans. Animas are not waistful, and I would think the same would go for the monster in Cloverfield.

 

Well it's a giant monster film that plays by the giant monster film rules and some other ones, I love this film.

 

It looked like Godzilla to me....

 

Exactly my point, I don't and you do, and everyone is different. If everyone was the same it would be a pretty boring place.

 

Well the monster is a baby so maybe it hasn't gotten use to eatting things whole because most animals' paraents eat most of the food and give the baby the leftovers.

 

I think he meant the Cloverfeild monster, unless you are talking about it, because it didn't look much like godzilla to me.

 

I love the film to death I mean I LOVE IT. Its the only film that I have seen in a very, very, VERY long time that actully keeps me interested.

 

About that.Where could the monster's parents be?If that thing was a baby,then they must be huge!

And really?I thought burnitup was talking about the Godzilla movie...oh well.

 

No Zilla is not Godzilla.

Godzilla is a mutant Godzillasaur, Zilla/GINO/Fakezilla is a mutant Iguana. They are nothing alike.

The parants probably died, the monster has been under the ocean for thousands and thousands of years.

 

Not always just the leftovers, if a pack of wolves is low on food it still gives the pups some even if the rest of the pack could eat it all and forget the pups. That raises the question where are it's parents/parent are/is (the species could be hemaphrodites)

 

But this thing is most likely not a pack hunter.

 

Well I don't really give a damn if the movie is good, fake or not either way if it's enjoyable it's enjoyable.

But how though what possible thing could they have died from?

 

I don't know, that will be a mystery.

 

No probably not, unlikely there would be many of it because it's so big.

 

I agree.
Both the 'fake' Godzilla as you say and Cloverfield were good.

I wonder too.Maybe in the futuer they will say.On the Sequel,I don't know.

Anyways,bye you guys!

 

Probably.

...but you think a carcass would have shown up somwhere.

Yea.

I hope there isn't a sequel, I don't think it would really work for the movie. Like ET, it was great, but noody wan't a sequil to it because it would ruin it.

see ya.

 

No Cloverfield could beat Zilla into the ground so very fast. Zilla got hit by 12 missles and died. Cloverfield got carpet bombed and took bullets and tank missles and survived the USA's Mother Of All Bombs. Zilla ran away from the military, Cloverfield fought them and didn't run away.

Watch how fast Zilla gets killed in Godzilla: Final Wars by the REAL Godzilla.

Maybe the bodies are still under the ocean.

 

Clover didn't fight, it just kinda stubled around confused and angery. And I don't really care who went down first or who could beat who if they got in a slap fight, I just care if I enjoyed it, you gotta look at the big picture not just ther little details. Overall I liked both movies and I don't really feel like comparing them because they where both enjoyable, some parts less or than others. But overall if I think a movie was good okay, I don't like having to go into detail about why I should not like it or why I should.

and in all truth that thing shoulda died eaisly, only rats and cockroaches can live though a nuke and only the radiation not the intial blast of it.

they could be...maybe but normally the gasses that build up would bring them to the surface.

 

One it was not nuked, the nuked would have destroyed all of New York City no just Manhattan.