Birth by Sleep BBS Theories and Questions...

Discussion in 'Kingdom Hearts HD II.5 ReMIX' started by Destiny's Force, Sep 27, 2007.

  1. Destiny's Force Mess with the best, lose like the rest...

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2007
    Location:
    With Amber <3
    141
    That'd be Aqua. We don't know the relationship between those two. Whether it's attraction or parental.
     
  2. daxma Hei Long: Unrivalled under the Heavens

    Joined:
    May 14, 2007
    Location:
    Ireland somewhere
    143
    I don't agree with the ven theory because ven was about 15 when sora was 4 but there is a chance of the Xeahnort theory.I'm glad you broke away from the average theories.
     
  3. Radiowave ITSA PIIINCH

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Location:
    You know, across the universe
    268
    Yes, i agree with this. it works. I dont know how MX summoned what you are calling xehanort, but I think its pretty plausible.
    Then again, its not...so far we've seen in kingdom hearts that when you split into two people, the new person formed is the exact same person as the original, just with a different personality/different side of the heart. If this proves true for bbs...then that dark soldier can only be a MX look-a-like in a suit.

    STOP!
    Ven cannot be Sora's dad...for some reason its rare, but theres a magazine scan showing terra and ven, looking at 4 year old and 5 year old sora and riku. Ven looks 16. Take away 4 from 16 and you have 12...
    a father being 12 years older than his son. doesnt make sense. I'd say that out of the 3, Terra, Ven and Aqua, only Terra is an adult.
     
  4. Way2Dawn Traverse Town Homebody

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Back from the dead (as of 9/24/13)
    7
    113
    Yeah, but there is a theory that the "knights" have the ability to go forward and backward in time.
     
  5. Radiowave ITSA PIIINCH

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Location:
    You know, across the universe
    268
    thats exactly what it is. a theory. that means its not true, because it hasnt been proven.