a question for lesbians/gays

For the emprah.

 

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!!

 

i'd bang myself if it were possible

i mean

it kinda is

but you get me

 

technically, don't you get you?

 

what's the question for people who are hot 23 yr old furries from uranus?​

 

What do you think of Earth?

 

Lemme guess, it's ass.

 

You're ass.

 

i find their primitive non-robot horses rather attractive​

 

We are missing the higher question at work here, implied yet unanswered as of this post. Does the mirror self feel attraction toward its recipient? Are there fantasies hidden behind the sharp, obscure reflection. It's Somatic Interpretation 101, gentlemen, which you would learn in any basic Psych class. There is a reason why you can't follow their gaze--! The spouse that has been caught sleazing will evade his SO's gaze at every opportunity. Be weary of your reflections, my friends, at least the shadows are cloaked to the extent where you can't read their expressions anyways. Physiognomy is a dead science.

 

I know this is the spam zone, and this is one of my threads
But God Damn you people get weird

 

I think the more interesting question is if "gay" and "straight" actually exist. The way I see it, everybody is bi and the labels "gay" and "straight" only exist because most people lean farther to one side than the other, making "true bi" comparatively rare. Don't all people have that one person they'd switch sexualities for?

 

You're literally asking if someone can be turned on by them self if they're gay

 

No weirder than the shit you post and ask.

 

I understand how you mean here, but I feel you have misinterpreted the concept of sexuality. It is a means of personal identification, and the modern definition thereof exists in order to communicate the individual's interests: if someone who identifies as bisexual expresses interest in someone of the same sex who identifies as heterosexual, then it is safe to assume that the latter won't reciprocate the former's interest. Of course, sexuality is a spectrum, à la the Kinsey scale-- which, interestingly, disregards the existence of asexuality just as you are doing here now. Sexuality is not rigid, and humans cannot be perfectly separated into Skinnerian boxes, etc. I also believe there are gay individuals out there that that feel approx. 0% for their opposite sex.

Are our definitions infallible? No, but they get the meaning across and as I see it that's all that matters in the end. You have the foundation of an argument here, but it would have been more relevant to, instead of focusing on the inefficiency of our definitions concerning "sexuality," endorse a more detached method of viewing sexual interactions-- that is, go the way of the ancient Greeks and categorize sexual acts as "heterosexual" or "homosexual" in nature rather than form private identities to explain the same events. Empirical evidence is a lot less murky to define.

 

Well excuuuuuuse me, Sass Queen

 

straight and gay are a product of our binary minded culture
the same one that says you have to be left wing or right wing
and that criticizing something means you hate it

 

I've been sitting here trying to come up with a response and failing. All I can do is frown and shake my head disapprovingly.

 

It turns out that there are several other orientations and genders, you just can't see them. However, intercourse with each existing gender is required in order to reproduce.

no one will get this reference, i know it