Digital Art 3 sig thread combo tri attack power force go!

...:/

I decided to post 3 sigs in one thread.

The first I just made and is by far my ****tiest yet.

The second is a sig I made particularly to look good in black and white. I didn't really "try", persay, but I made it specifically to go with my black and white combination profile.

The 3rd is my Sugar Free sig that I posted a while ago that...what...2 people replied to?

Anyway, cnc on all 3 would be greatly appreciatted. And to those that haven't figured it out...HELP ME!!! I'M DROWNING IN COMPLETE SLUMPAGE!!! DX

 

Wtf? That's spam, unless you actually have a comment or a bit of critisism, don't post here.

 

in the first one, the stock is WAY to contrasted.
I'm not feeling the swirls, either. He's also going against the flow. And, there;s random darks spots, even over light spots.

But, I love the text XDDDDD

The second one is just..... wtf? lol


The third is pretty good. The stock and around it is very attractive, which is good.

 

3rd ftw!!! =D

The first one has too much going on, is too contrasted, sharp and it's monotone. Overall, I'd just scrap it. Nice try though. There are some decent area's on that tag.

The second well...doesn't really count as a sig. Effects are messy and the text doesn't appeal at all to me the way it's presented.

And the third...omfg. Give me a tutorial. Now. D:

 

First one is godly contrasted dude. One of your worst. You always do great, this one is really disliking. Lower the brightness and contrast. GJ

The second one is a bit wierd imo. I see the effects are nicely done, but it wasn't pulled off that nicely. The text...is a bit iffy. But I know it's pretty hard to end up with a sig like that, so props. GJ

The third is freakin nice. The border could be a no though. Other than that, GJ.

overall, dude. A few bads. But I know you'll get back and bomb with another epic sig lawl.

 

I changed the contrast of the first one with a few brightness/contrast layers. It's not amazingly different but I'd say it's at least better...

Re-cnc?

 

Did you? I see no difference...honestly...XD

 

it actually seems brughter xD

 

Jeez, I lowered the contrast by 100, and the brightness by 39...XD

You guys just aren't seeing the difference cause there's no before and after. I deleted the old one from my photobucket and replaced it...XD

 

XD.

Dude wrong move lawl.

 

I personally still can't see the difference.

Shoulda posted both versions man. xD

 

Oh come on, there's totally a difference, just look at that screenshot...XD

 

>>

I dont see a difference Cin. They both look the same to me

Edit: S***, I though I put CnC in this post D:

*tries to remember what she said*

1. It looks Really busy to me, You lose some of the picture in the process, and its hard for me to read the text at the bottom

2. I really like this one, not sure what effect you used, but it turned out very nicely for what you were trying to do with the name.

3. I just dont like this one that much, the colors dont seem to go to gether in my eyes, and I just dont like it that much
But dont listen to me considering I cant make signatures for my life

 

I told you not to post unless you give cnc...>.>

And whatever, I changed the sig quite a bit, but there's no reason to fight over it. If you guys don't see it, fine, like Darky said, I'm going to scrap it...XD

 

Cin have you tried re-naming the file?

Even after replacing it, the URL might still reconise it as the old one. That could be why no-one is seeing a difference.

 

Because I do notice the difference in the sigs. if it works for my computer wouldn't it work for most others as well?

 

The face is a bit better. The yellow color is better than all white.

The gray parts work better. V2 ftw

 

What I mean is. Lets say the URL was this

http://www.photobucket.com/lolsig.png

but then you delete it and replace it with a picture of the same name. So this makes the URL exactly the same as before.

But when you show it, it will still show the old picture on the forum as it's yet to reconise the change.

 

Yeah, I got that. But it changed on the forum here from what I can see, it clearly did for me. I'm just saying wouldn't it work for everyone elses as well if it did for mine?