Kingdom Hearts II Sora vs. Org. XIII

Discussion in 'Kingdom Hearts HD II.5 ReMIX' started by LoneWolf, May 22, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LoneWolf Hollow Bastion Committee

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Location:
    Google Earth
    15
    641
    i thought about this for some time now, and I realized that Org. XIII wanted to become a real being, along with all the Nobodies. They could of actually done some good, besides that fact they were screwing up the worlds. Why did sora have to do such a mean thing? All they wanted was a heart, poor Org. XIII -sad song on worlds smallest violin-
     
  2. Princess Celestia Supreme Co-Ruler of Equestria

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    166
  3. AntiWeapon Chaser

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    73
    Because they were screwing up the world...

    Its exactly like Terorist bombing random places for there cause.

    The nobodies were ****ing over simple worlds. They had to be stopped. Nuff said.
     
  4. Princess Celestia Supreme Co-Ruler of Equestria

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    166
    Who were they hurting prior to Sora saying he would rather kill them then let them be whole.

    Sora caused more loss of life when he refused to killl the heartless.

    Your arguement got trumped.
     
  5. pirateking_luffy Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2008
    Location:
    1942,Normandy.
    45
    458
    cause in sora's and mickey's and everybody else's eyes,they were evil.and also on my personel note,sora is an idiot.
     
  6. Princess Celestia Supreme Co-Ruler of Equestria

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    166
    Mickey never said they were evil. I need proof! He only got mad at Xemnas personally when Xemnas used Kingdom Hearts as a weapon.

    In fact, Mickey and Namine both implied otherwise about Organization XIII.
     
  7. pirateking_luffy Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2008
    Location:
    1942,Normandy.
    45
    458
    well he didn't say they were evil,he said it was the things in the darkness that they hated and they say that were doing evil things to people
     
  8. Princess Celestia Supreme Co-Ruler of Equestria

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    166
    When? Give me the exact line.

    Mickey strongly implied that Org XIII was not evil.

    Namine refused to answer when asked directly, "Is Organization XIII the bad guys?"

    You would think she would have said "HELLS YEAH!" after what happened at Castle Oblivion. But she didn't, which tells me she truly thinks otherwise.
     
  9. pirateking_luffy Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2008
    Location:
    1942,Normandy.
    45
    458
    i am not about to argue with a lawyer,the court is yours good sir
     
  10. Princess Celestia Supreme Co-Ruler of Equestria

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    166
    [​IMG]

    You can thank Repliku, Destiny's Force, and Pika_power for my debating prowess on this matter.

    I've been through this arguement so many times I've seen every angle. I'm sure they could probably say the same thing from there end.

    *TwilightNight* helped my case a lot too.
     
  11. pirateking_luffy Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2008
    Location:
    1942,Normandy.
    45
    458
    and for beating me i will rep you and this
    [​IMG]
     
  12. Repliku Chaser

    353
    You both are right in a way. Yes, King Mickey didn't say they were evil but he did say they had to be stopped, as did Yen Sid, as did Riku etc. They were messing up a lot of things and also not trying to get back to their bodies, but instead make the Nobodies whole as they were. The goals costed a lot of lives and also ironically made more Heartless and Nobodies. Their idea wasn't so wholesome but their method of employing it; even worse.

    ICSP: Where did Namine and Mickey make like they were 'good guys?'. They didn't strongly imply they were not evil. Sora never implied they were evil either under your same argument. Your argument can be countered against you ICSP as Namine and King Mickey were clearly fighting against them and trying to help Sora who was being centered and forced to play the Org's game. Even Yen Sid never said they were -evil- but it doesn't mean that they did not have to be stopped. Their methods again, put them in the predicament they chose. Sora did not.

    I'd suggest so people do not just get mad that another thread is devoted to 'Was Sora Justified' this move over to that thread. Please? I know others are extremely getting tired of seeing this argument everywhere else but there. Some even want that thread closed, but I think it should stay open because of reasons like this. It means people can go through there and ask this stuff as well as see what was already debated on.
     
  13. Radiowave ITSA PIIINCH

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Location:
    You know, across the universe
    268
    they were hurting tons of people before we saw them...you dont think the nobody version of kingdom hearts was created all by sora's heartless kills right? Either way it doesnt matter. whatever time period your talking about isnt important to kingdom hearts, and if it is, then we'll definately see it in 358/2 days. Im pretty sure in 358 days you'll be hurting ppl...or at least killing heartless. thats what the mission system is for...

    sora never refused to kill heartless. he said it, but he kept killing heartless anyway. there wasnt a moment in which sora didnt strike a heartless in a cutscene that came in close enough range.
     
  14. Arc Kingdom Keeper

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Eorzea
    133
    825
    these threads are not allowed, please read the rules
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.