Poems about Always-Online and Modern Survival Horror

Discussion in 'The Spam Zone' started by Hayabusa, Apr 24, 2013.

  1. Hayabusa Venomous

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Gender:
    Cisgender Male
    Location:
    Tokyo-3
    2,519
  2. Trigger hewwo uwu

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2006
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Corridors of Time
    1,526
    this is bittersweet because i love jim sterling but i hate yahtzee
     
  3. Hayabusa Venomous

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Gender:
    Cisgender Male
    Location:
    Tokyo-3
    2,519
    What.

    I have never heard it like this, it's always the opposite I hear.

    But oh wells different strokes.
     
  4. Technic☆Kitty Hmm

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Indiana, USA
    1,299
    I'm not sure who is who, name wise, so . . .

    I liked Always John better because it was a much better read. I liked the one about horror games too, but not as much as the guy reading . . . he just didn't have that "Morgan Freeman" feel to him. They were both really cool, and after watching this I just had one of those "wow" moments. Thanks for showing me this wonderful piece of literature ^^
     
  5. Hayabusa Venomous

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Gender:
    Cisgender Male
    Location:
    Tokyo-3
    2,519
    First is Ben "Yahtzee" Croshaw, second is Jim Sterling
     
  6. Technic☆Kitty Hmm

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Indiana, USA
    1,299
    K, then I liked Yahtzee better than Jim. Though I liked what Jim was singing about more than Yahtzee. Yahtzee was just a better presenter.

    Like he was almost "Morgan Freeman" good.
     
  7. Ars Nova Just a ghost.

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2009
    Gender:
    hungry
    Location:
    Hell 71
    2,986
    Are you serious they put these two in the same show MY GOD MY LIFE I-

    ...Oh they're just reading poems in isolated locations

    ...

    :|


    I like Jim more than I like Yahtzee. Ben is a performer; he is expected to find flaws in every single thing he reviews, and that's what he does. Even when the flaws are inane or he only finds one or two and is forced to hammer on them over and over. Jim's not even a reviewer to speak of, he just talks about whatever topic he decides needs attention. And he does perform, but he also brings facts and figures where relevant, makes solid points and enjoys more than three games on the planet. He manages to be bitter where called for without being pigeonholed into it.

    Now what I'd really like to see is these two arguing over Dynasty Warriors. That'd be hilarious. :'D