Let us hold an intelligent discussion in the Spam Zone.

Today on Let Us Hold An Intelligent Discussion in the Spam Zone, we discuss the improbability of holding an intelligent discussion in the Spam Zone.

Starring your lovely host, images of Tycho Brahe.

 

Tycho Brahe, I love that drunk.

 

Intelligent Discussion on the Spam Zone is quite possibly a near improbability; every thread will without a doubt diverge topics due to the efforts of one or more persons involved. This thread on the improbability of intelligent discussion in the Spam Zone is clearly no exception.

 

I'd say if we took the inverse of the derivative minus the hypotenuse twice the value of the variable "x" we'd find that the probability of having an intelligent discussion in the spam zone is...

wait let me calculate...
(checking over work)

Seven Muffins.

 

Those muffins each filled with the raisins of relevant improbability.

 

When I read the thread title, I wondered: Who would actually try to successfully create an intelligent thread in the SpamZone?
And then it hit me. What?.

 

There's barely any intelligent discussion in the Discussion section.

 

Because you're only supposed to discuss things there. Intelligent discussion is in the Intelligent Discussion section as its name may suggest. However, we are separated from that section by significant space-time. Therefore, we cannot discuss anything intelligently.

 

no this thread is not.

 

I really want to hit you with a hammer.
And I'm not talking about no ban hammer either.

 

Of course, it depends what is meant by intelligent. The ability to read, write, and to comprehend the subject of this thread means that all posts show signs of intelligence.

Even attempted hijacks.

 

hijack diverted.

 

His underpants just caught fire.

 

This would be assumed to contribute to the improbability of an intelligent discussion on the Spam Zone. If one were to bake a pie with the mathematical formula previously stated by Radiowave, taking into account the current plausibility level of an intelligent discussion on a Spam Zone, one would observe that the content within the pie would bake to a certain degree of ignorance, a chain as per most of the threads of the Spam Zone.

With this, it may be possible to form an accurate mathematical formula or theory on the proper implausibility of intelligent discussion on the Spam Zone taking to account all proper variables.

 

My good sir, it seems you're not taking into account the value of the Imaginary Numbers that would arise from said equation. Given that there is a lack of Intelligence in this Intelligent Discussion topic, that would give it a negative value. Therefore, later on in said equation, you would have to root the negative value, causing an impossibility. You need to take into account the Imaginary Numbers before any Intelligent Discussion can be held here.

I like your maternal figure's pastried posterior.

 

First, one must define the length required of social intercourse for it to qualify for the categorisation of 'discussion'. Unless this is achieved, we cannot find an answer to the question at hand.


Now on a completely unrelated topic, is a hooker pie a possibility?

 

Is the improbabilty that someone can ever uphold an intelligent discussion on the spam zone two to the power of two hundred and seventy-six thousand seven hundred and nine to one against?

That one against being one of the muffins mentioned earlier?

 

Sorry, I just had to fix that minor spelling error in your argument. And you are most correct, good sir. We must define the length of time it would take of discussion deemed "up to par" with what others would consider "intelligent" before we can start an intelligent discussion in said Spam Zone. Now then, does anyone volunteer to time our next discussion?

 

Don't bastardise my language you filthy American!

May I recommend we define the length of time in a different forum?

 

HAI GAIZ WATSAP?a