So if God doesn't want homosexuality, then why is it naturally programmed into some organisms- organisms other than humans, even? Homosexual activity has been observed among dolphins and other mammals in nature, so why does this all-loving God make us naturally inclined to sin to the point that homosexuals are essentially forced to sin or live life alone? I can see the argument with murder and stealing and whatnot since that's more of a free will issue, but honestly, the argument that homosexuality is a choice is dying very quickly. That being said, why would a God that loves us and wants a world devoid of sin incline certain organisms to sin beyond their free will?
xD In that case I hope to god that you enter, or at least consider it. Last week we had two entries. And one vote. By one of the participants. >>
Cool as snow- *shot*
Yes, I'll post one tonight or tomorrow night most likely. I've been trying to think of a theme that would be broad enough for a lot of people to...
You guys upset me.
Oh awesome, glad to hear you're still into the comedy thing. Gonna do it again for the talent show? And nice, what do you wanna major in? o:
Sure, shoot.
Not much, hombre. Just practicing Beast and the Harlot. It's simple, but obnoxiously fast on guitar. How about you?
That convo was so scandalous.
Good to hear, how's the real world been treating you? And we split a while ago, back in October. I'm with someone IRL now.
Hey, I haven't heard from you in a while. How are you?
First impression? Impression now? Aren't I so creative? Why are you so awesome? VAMOS A HACER NUESTRA CASA EN EL CIELO DE ALGUNA SELVA? What does a coquita look like in your mind? Do you think it's humanly possible to swim from the Long Island Sound to San Juan?
But that'd make the central government extremely powerful and it'd take a lot of power away from the state legislatures. The framers of the Constitution set up everything for a reason; states have the power to make laws so the government is more balanced and less centralized, since the Founding Fathers feared having another "tyrannical" ruler (though I don't agree that the British were tyrants to the Colonists at all). I think it depends on the law, honestly. There's no black and white way to say what should be state and what should be national, but there are some laws where it makes sense to be state or national. Highway laws should be national due to the interstate highway system, sales tax laws should be state because different states have different means of revenue and different budgets to meet. It comes down to a matter of individual cases, really. So in the case of driving age, I think it should be national since it doesn't affect the states too much and it'd just make things easier. It's not exactly a step towards tyranny to give the national government the power to regulate the driving age.
Well a year away can make people forget. =P And ah I see. Things in general or just on this site?
Haha I can imagine why, it's been ages. How have you been?
Well hello there. o: Remember me?
Why would you watch that? It made me in all of my manliness shed a tear, therefore it's entirely inhumane.
Oh Jesus, you embedded a video. xD Interesting vid...
No, solamente hablo espanol. Vayate.
ME ME ME? :D a
