Seems like DVD releases come quicker and quicker. Too quick in this case :/
lol internet dating.
I don't mind if I know/like the person well enough. I also like calling people by their first names, when applicable. Well now I know not to ask for it :v
So the game is fun. I didn't play too much of D/P before picking this up, so I dunno what's changed, but as a game in general, it's entertaining. Sucks that it's so hard for me to connect to wi-fi though. Damn WEP encryption.
http://www.csua.berkeley.edu/~reeser/demons.html
Rabbits don't chew their cud either.
I think they deserve secular, legal marriage at the very least. :/
PM me the name?
Pizza makes an awesome breakfast.
where is this from?
Well golly gee wiz, I think so too.
Formally speaking (this isn't directed specifically at you KaiXIII, I figure someone will probably mention this down the line and feel like I should get it out of the way now), what the Pope (or any other christian or islam or what have you; though actually, the catholic church does acknowledge evolution last I checked) believes isn't really a "theory", at least by the definition science uses. The word "theory" in general use usually denotes an uncertain fact, a collection of guesses and shaky infferences, etc, but that's not what the word means to science at all. A scientific theory is basically a collection of explanations for a certain observed phenomenon in nature. You have the fact of gravity, you also have the theory of gravity. You have the fact of eletromagnetism, you have the theory of electromagnetism. And of course, you have the fact of evolution, and the fact of evolution. A scientific theory has to stand up to scrutiny; it has to have proof (and a lot of it), must be coherent with observed data, must be testable, must be able to make predictions, and it must be falsifiable. Contrary to what many anti-evolutionists will have you believe, evolution fits all that criteria. There is little debate amongst scientists about the facts/basics of evolution and whether it happened or not. What's disputed is the exact mechanics of evolution, what factors were more important in shaping the evolution of life, etc. Creationism (or intelligent design, or whatever you want to call it, it boils down to the same thing), on the other hand, fits none of that. It's like saying "it was magic" and being done with it. It's nowhere near on the level of evolution.
lol debate in the spam zone
Poster. I don't make threads too often.
I don't even remember, it sucks anyway, as probably does the reason why I chose it in the first place. :v I'm getting it changed as soon as possible.
Eh, I liked Haruhi and everything, but I'm not "OMG THIS IS ****ING AWESOME I HAVE TO WATCH THIS CANNOT WAIT FOR SEASON TWO **** YESSSSSS"
That's what I always understood to have happened. We didn't evolve from the primates of today, we all evolved from a common ancestor. They're all just as modern as us.
Numerology is as valid as astrology, really; in others words, not at all.
It's not *meant* to tell you why, at least not in the sense you're implying. It's meant to be descriptive, just like the rest of science. It's not their job to answer that question.
I believe in evolution. All Creationism has to try and justify itself are arguments based on pure subjectivities that prove nothing. Also, before anyone brings it up Intelligent Design IS creationism, in essentials.
