Well the only part of that I can tell you..is that girls are scientifically proven to have a higher sex drive than guys...which isn't a big consolation to their perversion, but oh well. And I personally think it can be a gene trait. However, it's mostly on how they were raised, and what they like in their opinions. =/
Thriller - FOB
LOLOLOOL OMG. I wish I was that last guy. >DDDDDDDDDDD Very nice find. xDDDDD
Lol...closing this then. Btw..I like the suggestion. :)
That's a LOT better. That is absolutely 100% better. =D All I'd recommend is maybe sharpening some (not all) of some of those brush strokes underneath. You don't have to, since it looks like total win the way it is. =D
Well Emo is more like a branch of Goth. They stole the style (Sorta, only with tighter clothing), and basically inserted overly emotional-aspects. To me, I think emo-girls are very attractive. However I do always find my share of non-emo girls who are far more attractive...in which case all my friends are emo, btw. xD Anyway, goth and emo are merely a form of rebellion. They are a form of social caste that revolves around different taste, and most of them find a way to make things appear differently in their minds. Like Emo's think most things are a lot worse than they might be. Or Goth's might find them to be merely a happening they could really care less about, when it's actually more important. Well moreover...they are just stereotypes. Like Hissora said...it's the way they are seen and not EVER shown by who they actually are. And mostly revolves around how they wear their clothing. Color, technique, costume, etc...
Looks like a lot of filter's and brushes. =/ Anyway..light source is too strong. Bring out the render. Take the render, put it on top, and put it on multiply at whatever opacity you want. That should bring it out somewhat. =/ Borders are a little too thick, IMO, also. =/ It's very nice though. :) Very appealing with all those effects. :)
Hmm...well...let's try to figure it out... If I were to explain the big bang idea then we'd have earth crashing into a larger planet (then known as the moon), and rocks flying everywhere. Then they spun around becoming denser, soon forming a circular object known as Earth. The rest floated around, also becoming more and more dense soon becoming the moon, which then was extremely close the earth. Which generated large amounts of heat from the already volcanic and highly toxic frontier of the planet as it was. Lol. Then, according to the theory, 3.5 (or something) million years later, life began and such. =/ Anyone want to elaborate a little with me? t.t
Fame < Infamy - FOB
Well why don't you explain to me why they call it the 'big bang THEORY' then? The reason they call it that is because they used common understanding of stars and other events that happen every day in our galaxy/star-system, and many others. And besides, this kind of stuff has happened before, so it's three-hundred times more likely than God making it. This is even a proven fact, where religious belief's lie in mystery to science, for science doesn't understand its concepts. You know why? Because they are beliefs set in faith. And Christians who want to belief God made it is fine. But it's merely placed in their faith. And I don't have that kind of faith, and I follow how it actually WOULD happen, and how it IS possible. So there... I hope that clarified. >.>
Bang the Doldrums - FOB
SotW #9 Voting thread *Updated list* Submission piece.^ I kinda rushed it..so yeah. xD You know the drill. Vote away! :) Voting ends Feb. 15.
Can this be closed or...? =/
The ball sucks. >.> The originals are better. Screw this so called 'new' ball. =/ It probably has no grip anyway. =/
Have you ever read about stars? And how they're created? Maybe that would shed some light on that subject. And btw, it's a 'theory' not a creation 'myth'. That wouldn't make sense...IMO. xD
No offense CFF, but this is...well this is the worst piece of crap I've ever read...>.> The above statement has been rewritten on account of it's honesty...and truth. >.>
Thanks bro. That's tight. =D
You have to work more on text. =/ And stop blurring the edges like that. I understand you're using the physics of peripheral vision, but that does that on it's own while looking at the focal point. x3 So stop blurring! xD Anyway, the text...start putting more effort into it. Mess around with it. The style you're using is far too simple and it doesn't look at great at all, IMO. I don't really even like the color of the tag, ontop of that. =/ Keep it up. :)
....no. A male is TOTALLY a woman, btw. [/sarcasm ninja]
