Search Results

  1. P
    Post

    Sexuality

    It is if you take it as a biological term. It can also mean a lack of sexual desires.
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  2. P
    Post

    Sexuality

    I hate to ruin fun, but even so, I feel I should point out that Gatz is joking.
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  3. P
    So why have you put the definition at being a fetilised egg? Why not, for example, a sperm and an egg?
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  4. P
    Post

    Sexuality

    Nope, but I felt it deserved a mention. :P
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  5. P
    Even so, laws of today are interfering with the analogy. The chaingun Toyota, for example, would clearly be illegal to drive on the road, and that factor can taint and bias people's judgement of the paralleled situation of the PS3 when it should not. Furthermore, people are bringing in weapon and gun analogies, which draw upon specific regulation laws, which further confuse the issue.

    It'd be prudent to lay off the analogies for a bit, or at least limit them to a sentence or two.
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  6. P
    Now we're getting somewhere.

    What moral justifications are you using to define a human at that point? After all, a fertilised egg is significantly less complex than a pig, or a cow, but we happily slaughter them by the billions.

    Are you averse to the morning-after pill? How about other forms of contraception?
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  7. P
    If I had my way, it's what the entire forum would be like.

    Guys, if we're arguing law, can we lay off the host of analogies, and start arguing with laws? It's complex enough without trying to prove a point by drawing half-functioning parallels.
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  8. P
    Post

    Sexuality

    The lack of Objectum Sexuality disappoints me. Honestly, you should try to be more considerate of others' feelings. How would you like it if you were a minority group, and people refused to acknowledge you?
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  9. P
    Please revise your definition of 'human being' to include such embryos, or otherwise explain why you have a problem with it, despite them not being human.
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  10. P
    Many embryos are fertilised outside of the womb for practicality. However they cannot all be put into the womb at once. Usually one or two are placed in the womb at a time, while the rest are frozen outside. More often than not, once a foetus has successfully been grown, the remaining frozen embryos are destroyed.
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  11. P
    Query: You have no qualms with the destruction of frozen embryos used in IVF?
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  12. P
    Define: 'Living'

    Define: 'Human being'
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  13. P
    D:

    /wrists
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  14. P
    What definition of 'murder' are you using? The legal definition of 'murder' does not consider abortion to be murder.

    The law against incest has the intention of preventing children from an incestuous relationship from being born. What is the difference between preventing the incest, and preventing the child that comes from the incest before it is conscious?

    So what's the difference between aborting a foetus, and using a condom? Either way, the generations of children don't exist.

    There is no need, but if it's not murder, then it's awfully convenient to kill it. There are already a lot of children in adoptive homes, and they don't have a great future. Also, we've got an overpopulation problem too. So if abortion isn't murder (which we're also discussing) then it seems to be a good choice, as it deals with these problems nicely.

    Interesting that you don't take the same view of it being fatal. "Suck it up and have the baby. You got pregnant". Presumably she knew the risks before having sex, so isn't the potential danger from childbirth just another thing she should suck up?

    Gotta love irony.

    I don't understand what you mean. ;)

    hOnK.


    Well the entire point of incest laws is to prevent incest-children, is it not? I don't feel your analogies accurately represent that aspect of the situation.

    So breaking the law created to prevent the creation of incest-children has a punishment of raising an incest-child and releasing it into society? That seems awfully counter-intuitive, if not directly contradictory of the initial objective.
    Post by: P, Feb 20, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  15. P

    You know, it's almost as if everyone's a flawed person, trying not to screw up and make mistakes in front of the opposite sex. Who woulda thunk it?
    Post by: P, Feb 19, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  16. P
    Even though incest is illegal?

    How about incest rape? (As that sort of thing is rarely consensual.)
    Post by: P, Feb 19, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  17. P
    That sounds like a more eloquent way of saying this.
    Post by: P, Feb 19, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  18. P
    Are you addressing me, or Te Deum?
    Post by: P, Feb 19, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  19. P
    Post

    Voxli tiem

    So FKB can get away with ritually sacrificing her cousin. (And Makaze wanted it for some reason.)
    Post by: P, Feb 19, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone
  20. P
    Talking≠cheating.
    Post by: P, Feb 19, 2011 in forum: The Spam Zone