Search Results

  1. Styx
  2. Styx
  3. Styx
  4. Styx
    I don't have legal better offers.
    Profile Post by Styx for Magick, Oct 29, 2009
  5. Styx
  6. Styx
    * Rule Of Rose
    For its metaphors and intricateness.
    * The World Ends With You
    For its welll...art.
    * Xenogears / Xenosaga
    For its succesful mixture of sci-fi, psychology and philosophy.
    * Shin Megami Tensei: Nocturne
    For its spiritual side, the fact that it goes against virtually every cliché in the book and the character designs.
    * Silent Hill
    For its use of metaphors and use of the blood-and-rust theme.
    * Okami
    If you really need a reason for this, you need professional help.
    Post by: Styx, Oct 29, 2009 in forum: Gaming
  7. Styx
  8. Styx
    Well, it's not so much a question of how you would do it. The core of it all is: would you hurt someone in the most terrifying ways you can think of in order to save many, many others?

    I'll repeat that just to make sure.
    The core of it all is: would you hurt someone in the most terrifying ways you can think of in order to save many, many others?
    Post by: Styx, Oct 29, 2009 in forum: Discussion
  9. Styx
  10. Styx
    Not at all. Do come in. :D
    Profile Post by Styx for Magick, Oct 29, 2009
  11. Styx
    Peace-and-War inspired me for this thread. Credit goes to him. But anyway...
    You know that doctor character from the first episode? The one with the cure for cancer? Apparently, he's alive! And he takes the leading role for this episode. He still has the cure for cancer but he's quite an A-hole and decides to take his secret to the grave. The only way to the obtain the necessary knowledge is to torture it out of him. By which I mean torture him horribly. Just think of the worst you can think of. Would you do it?

    Also, this is a purely ethical question. I know the background story isn't waterproof and needn't be reminded of that. I don't want loophole-hunting to affect your answer in any way. In other words, I don't want horseshit such as this in my thread:
    Thread by: Styx, Oct 29, 2009, 9 replies, in forum: Discussion
  12. Styx
  13. Styx
    I'm sure the family of those cancer patients feels the same way, hun. And yes, you can replace love. It's childishly naive for anyone to think that they can't. What you can't replace is life. Sure, nobody's 100% irreplacable, but millions of folks sure are one hell of a lot less disposable than your boyfriend.
    Post by: Styx, Oct 29, 2009 in forum: Discussion
  14. Styx
  15. Styx
  16. Styx
  17. Styx
    This last one looks more experimental than your others. I've made similar "dialogue" poems and I find them pretty hard to pull off. Therefore I'm pleasantly surprised by how you did it. Good job on that! Hope you'll update soon.
    Post by: Styx, Oct 28, 2009 in forum: Archives
  18. Styx
  19. Styx
    I admit that I was a bit quick to judge. It all depends on whether you still have time to think or not. I suppose the humane impulse would be to save the one you love and leave the other one to die. Fair enough. However if you still had time for consideration, even a handful of seconds, you should have concluded that the happiness of several millions weighs more than your own. You really don't have to be a "saint" to realise that.

    That being said though...

    Yet you didn't. Pot kettle black. :p

    Read the others' replies, especially the ones I quoted (and yours) and see for yourself what kind of asinine reasons people give to (further) justify their choice. At least be honest with yourself and don't try to come up with any actual reasons to not save the doctor. You know they won't make sense. You said yourself that saving him would probably be the right thing to do. ;)
    Post by: Styx, Oct 28, 2009 in forum: Discussion
  20. Styx
    Right, because you choosing one option makes it human for everyone to choose the same. Like I said, ******ed half-ass reasons.
    Also, some people are saints. That's why there are saints in the first place. They sanctified a number of dead guys just a month ago.
    Why overgeneralize? Why say everyone will react the same way? Why not just say "being without my loved one scares the piss out of me"? You just make your rationale sound all the feebler.
    Post by: Styx, Oct 28, 2009 in forum: Discussion