Like I said, it's been ages since I played. I didn't really have a theme like "Warriors" or "Harpies" or something along those lines. The deck I played was made to kill monsters (strong ones too) without having to battle them. It was full of cards like Fissure, Hammer Shot (is that what it's called?), Trap Hole, Raigeki Break, Man-Eater Bug etc. An Anti Strong-Ass Monsters deck. I may not play it again though, but it kinda worked back in the days.
1. When a card says "once per turn", does that mean once during your turn AND once during your opponent's turn or only during your turn? 2. Is...
Dude, I have a few questions regarding the rules for you. Got a minute?
Yeah, we all just think of it as a really bad joke.
I heard the original purpose was to make a refuge for "beautiful people" because they attract too much attention from losers on other dating sites. Flawless plan except that the designer forgot to take into account that there is such a thing as a good-looking loser.
Personality? Not really. There are things in my personality I'd like to see changed (pride being nr. 1) but I'm content of my behaviour and personality overall. Skills, intelligence and all those attributes...Now that's another story. This phrase is often used in a silly context. People think that you aren't being yourself when your thoughts and actions differ. An example of this would be holding tears back in order to not show anyone that you want to cry. I disagree. The will to hold said tears back is just another aspect of one's personality, so in truth that person is being him/herself. There are situations however in which you are forbidden, dissuaded or unable to express certain aspects of your personality, but I think that doesn't limit "being oneself" as much as it limits "showing oneself". I believe the answer to this lies in another question: is it even possible to "turn off" your instincts completely? Maybe a personality is little more than a method of carrying out one's instincts. In which case we shouldn't speak of a mask but rather a face. Ask 1000 people whey they don't act upon their emotions and you may get answers that are based on emotions themselves, whether they be pride or compassion or whatever. See the example with the tears above. That being said, in this case I'll narrow these emotions down to primitive emotions or even just urges. Yes, it can be argued that this is less sincere to the outside world (see also: "showing oneself" above). However I think sincerity is a bargain price to pay for what we get in return. I for one would rather be insincere than irrational, egotistical and last but not least: predictable.
Well, people grow up. We're in 2010 now.
But there is a distance between you? In that case it has a somewhat bigger chance of working out. In that case I'd just delay the eventual getting together thing long enough (i.e. until your environments are a little more...alike).
Nope. In 2008 I didn't care much for the awards, being a noob and all. I don't think you're whiny though.
Sorry Jaden but I'm gonna learn some more. I've only lived through the game when it was still the basics of the basics so I have a lot to catch up on. Besides, if you're looking for epic battles I'd say you're at the wrong address. You're more likely to score an easy win.
One thing I have to ask though: you know this dude in real life right?
It's here because she's asking for opinions, which is confirmation that she made the right choice, which is Help With Life. Period. Now back on-topic or I'll have your posts deleted. I take it that by love you mean more than being interested in an adventure. In that case... The guy's 24. I know that girls often dig guys that are slightly older, but don't expect the same thing from him. He probably has a job by now and is finding his way in the big world. He's in a very different environment already even if you share common interests. The last thing he needs is a girlfriend who's still in school. If I were him, I'd gently decline. EDIT: Okay, so you're 17. That means my point stands. Three cheers for you if everything works out. But that's a big if.
That phrase is really getting old.
Diss failed.
I'll duel you when you get back, if you agree. I don't play (anymore); I know most of the rules and I'll learn the newer ones over the internet. I was kinda sorta hoping for a situation like this; now I have a chance of studying up without anyone getting impatient. It'll be a nostalgia shot for me. I know that I'm getting an unfair advantage since I can analyze Blackwing cards beforehand without you knowing what I'm going to play but I'm hoping you could see it as a compensation for my lack of experience. If not we'll think of some way around it.
That's not good. That's seriously not good.
I'll be jubilant when the day comes that people keep their paws off the classics. I don't think the Phantom of the Opera needs a sequel.
Too bad the Darwin Award of 2009 went to those two thieves who blew themselves up with their own explosives. Apparently they had some serious competition.
Happy late New Year, everyone! Guess I was more than a bit too late with closing last month's Poetry Contest... I apologise for that. But let's get to the first contest of the year! Last month's winner was Cariad, with a poem that laments an invertebrate's fate and manages to do so in a serious way. It was short but it was a gem, and I liked the flow a lot. This month's first poetry contest's theme is Desire. It can cover a wide range of feelings so I'm sure you'll come up with something. Good luck!
Holy hell, I totally forgot! One thousand apologies!
