And there's like a mini-game where you have to best him in a rap battle in order to unlock a secret costume and new BGM for him.
Seeing as my dude is Booker, mine would probably make sense as a mix of o' timey western with sci-fi elements. Or some cool graveyard on fire or something. I dunno why it just looks cool in my head. No real reason.
The whole M-rating and that Rockstar develops our game is just perfect.
Yeah, color me impressed. They even came with a little baggie with a drawstring.
These are pretty much what I use. Have had them for over a year and they work perfectly still.
Eh my old content sucked honestly. It got better until I became something of a douche after personal things but it turned good again after my temporary departure.
What I was thinkin, though we could do 360 as well just cause. although it's hard to work with that green
needed varus though ;.;
Someone needs to make a game box Or hell we can all do different versions of it Just need to figure out what system it'd be on
Ok I never owned BlazBlue but my friend did and I remember playing this dude a lot and he was just kickass. Man these things are so damn cool. I'd do one for you but I honestly haven't played Skullgirls yet ._.
Because its a really cool idea.
You know what else is overused? The Hero's Journey. You like Star Wars, right? Harry Potter? They're practically interchangeable. This doesn't mean they're inherently bad at all though, because they manage to make the plots and characters and events all have enough personality and development to differentiate them. It goes beyond just the concepts being sci-fi vs. magic. I'm basically saying that originality is really, really hard to actually do. What's more important is to do a story right. And back to Avengers, here's a video that largely goes over things about what the film does right (and wrong).
Why are you guys getting on Man of Steel when it hasn't even come out yet? It looks so much better than Superman Returns as well as a lot of previous Marvel films, not to mention that we already know there won't be kryptonite in the film, so that we don't get that annoying cliched story: instead, we can focus on her actual characteristic flaws and shortcomings. Yeah it's not completely original but at least it looks good.
I can has next Sforz?
Oh, alright. He just looked familiar. I don't watch him much but a friend of mine does and yeah.
Oh ok now I can post things on your page. Is that Tobuscus or whoever in your sig?
Also I choose Lord God.
Do we get to pick our own BGM?
Just because its a new start and whatever, doesn't excuse it having qualities of a bad film on its own. Spider-Man 3 at least kept a camp-like humorous tone to it throughout. I've already stated that 3 is still pretty bad, but Amazing didn't wow me either. Yeah, Eddie Brock should have actually looked like Eddie Brock, but the Lizard should have actually looked like the Lizard, NOT A GOOMBA FROM THE MARIO BROS MOVIE. Argument for that goes both ways. Sure the action scenes look a lot better, but there's more to a story than those. Want a good example of substantial plot while also having cool battles? Avengers, Iron Man, Captain America. As Sforz said already, I remember Spidey being snarky all of...two times in the film: the car burglar (which was awesome) and a little with the Lizard in the school. He is snarky as Peter Parker though, but it needs to be consistent...with development. I'll get into that later on in this post. Also, Gwen isn't all that smart either when she goes for a guy that openly breaks her father's dying wish. To me, she's no better (or worse) than Mary Jane was...though Emma Stone is smoking hot. Honestly, she's the second best character in the film, first being her dad. During the final battle against the Lizard, the freaking cop chief guy with a shotgun does a better job fighting the Lizard than Spider-Man... Not to mention, he randomly remembers OH SHIT THERE'S A GIANT LIZARD I NEED TO FIGHT right after fighting him the night before...this Peter Parker doesn't seem too bright to me. Also cops manage to actually almost capture him...SIGH. Still terrible, and anyone with knowledge of how to make a good film or story will agree. Even my friend who actually thought the movie was decent hates that scene, and for good reason. It's literally a 5 minute filler that serves like no purpose except to fill the slot that the original movie had of NYC folks helping Spidey against Goblin, or in the 2nd movie where they're carrying him through the train. I actually know who Peter Parker, Spider-Man, The Lizard, Aunt May, etc. are, no need trying to tell us. And how you can like the newer movie while hating the old ones YET HAVING READ THOSE COMICS is just...I can't fathom this. The old movies had a sense of wonder and silliness to them that I remember vividly from the old Spider-Man cartoons, video game (before the movies ever came out), and some comics. This one attempts to be SUPER SERIOUS for far too long throughout the story. Which is not what Spider-Man is about. He's a smart kid who makes jokes but learns through a tragedy that he should be using his new gifts for the right things rather than for himself...y'know, something that Amazing Spider-Man forgot. And I did like the Lizard...the real Lizard. This lizard's world domination plot doesn't fit at all with a film trying to look serious. His whole sympathetic sad story that I remember and was really hoping would be done well was botched and thus turned the Lizard in this film into a super cliche throwaway evil villain. HE EVEN HAS THE OVERDONE "OH I'M NOT REALLY EVIL I WAS JUST NOT SURE WHAT TO DO" TWIST NEAR THE END WITH SAVING PETER. His whole transformation into a lizard is alright, but why he wants everyone else to be lizard...uh, can I get an actual explanation? Peter Parker's whole motivation to be Spider-Man has been switched to pretty much rip off Batman: while he was supposed to have been using his powers for the wrong thing, this film saw it necessary to make Uncle Ben's death the result of him just being immature, not even using his powers. He kinda acts the same way throughout the film, while a true Peter Parker would have been nerdy and introverted in the beginning and then becoming snarky and cracking wise and taunting people. Amazing Spider-Man's Peter was immature at the beginning and immature at the end. I had high hopes for this movie, but ultimately it felt like a wasted chance, not to mention already having been an unnecessary reboot. The first film, while not perfect, did Spider-Man's origins so much better.
OH GOD FOR A SECOND I GOT REALLY SCARED
