JOB APP Username: FuzzyBlueLights **Alias: Fuzzy, Mr. Lights. Applying For: Waiter. Qualifications: Imagining myself as a waiter. *Rep-Card: http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z129/deven5/Capture.jpg Anything Else: I really like food. Username: FuzzyBlueLights I am here to: Dabble in Role-Playing. Meet new people. And get a job here. *Rep-Card: (Provided.) Anything Else: I just want people to get to know me.
I clearly said these people FEEL the love from the object. Just like we feel it from other people. Not that the object themselves give or emit it in any actual way. However, I will admit I gave an invalid statement. I meant obsessive in a fad sense. Going crazy and bananas over something like Americans did over silly bandz. Or another famous or infamous fad. And to even think about derepping someone out of ignorance is spiteful. Correct and/or teach the ignorant so that they can learn. Anyway, I give apologies to any I've offended with my misguided statement.
It was moved to the debate corner because, it turned into one. Plenty of evidence has been posted from each side. "We might not understand it, or be in that situation ourselves, but maybe to this human they do feel loved by this object." If you looked at our research. They clearly DO feel loved by this object. From your words, Celest, I take it that you cannot understand why a human being with emotions and feelings would fall in 'love' with an object incapable of such things. Whether we human-lovers understand it or not, they feel that same love, same connection that we feel from our special guy or girl. Some how, some way. They believe that they FEEL that way. Hell, humans can say they love you, but be totally lying, we don't ever know, we have to trust and FEEL that loved one is telling the truth and we have to believe in it. Just like people with OS feel and believe that their object loves them too. Also, people have been tested. And they did so willingly, without getting offended at all. True, humans have obsessed over objects for centuries, but haven't those obsessives people simply discarded those things as soon as something new and shiny came along? People with OS don't do that, they view their object as a personal lover, to have, hold, and cherish. And it's called Sexuality because some people do get a sexual response in themselves from the object they care for. However, some do not. Some are simply content being with it. A doctor did clarify that if trauma was one of the factors deciding if a person had OS or not, then there would be way more people with OS. So trauma, be it sexual or abusive in general, is not a reason a person would have OS.
papa wants your sweet tumblr. >:L Please.
I envy your pinsy.
The Legend of Minecraft.
Whoa whoa whoa. :x OS is nothing like that. To them it's essentially like finding the one you love. Just in a inanimate object. A foreign concept to most, yes. But it doesn't make it unhealthy. Because these people are HAPPY and HEALTHY with these things that they love. And as the doctor stated, these people have nearly trauma free lives. They had friends, healthy relationships with their parents. It's just that instead of finding that special boy or girl, for some reason, they found that special bike, or car, or landmark even.
For those of you who are still confused and whatnot. Or just might find a few answers answered about this topic. In the branches of youtube is a segment Tyra Banks did on her show, where she interviewed Erika Eiffel(the woman who married the Eiffel Tower out of love.) and she also asks a Dr. Amy Marsh about OS. For those who are curious, here's the link where Tyra asks the Doctor the questions. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GepsXclonNU&feature=player_embedded#! Dr. Amy Marsh(A sexologist.) herself points out that in her opinion, she believes that it's just like being heterosexual, homosexual, etc.. Which is what I'm leaning towards, as opposed to it being an illness of some sort.
So many opinions. It makes me happy. And yes, the capital M implies that I meant the vehicle, Mustang. Thank you Celest for clearing that up. Just a bit of info: Erika Eiffel, whose name derives from her marriage to the Eiffel Tower in 2007, has been featured as a spokesperson in a variety of international articles, radio talk shows, and television programs and documentaries worldwide. From my understanding, she's like the spokesman for people with object sexuality. Also from my understanding from researching this subject a bit, there appears to be no want or need to satisfy their sexual urges with the object they love. People with Object Sexuality just love and feel loved by these objects. No humping attached. "Contrary to sexual fetishism, the object to an OS person is viewed as their partner and not as a means to an end to enhance a human sexual relationship."
Object sexuality or objectum sexuality, in German objektophil (OS), is a pronounced emotional and often romantic desire towards developing significant relationships with particular inanimate objects. Those individuals with this expressed preference may feel strong feelings of attraction, love, and commitment to certain items or structures of their fixation. For some, sexual or even close emotional relationships with humans are incomprehensible. Object-sexual individuals also often believe in animism, and sense reciprocation based on the belief that objects have souls, intelligence, feelings, and are able to communicate. Contrary to sexual fetishism, the object to an OS person is viewed as their partner and not as a means to an end to enhance a human sexual relationship. So KHVians, my question to you is, what is your take on a human being falling in 'love' with an inanimate object, such as a car, or building, or graffiti wall? Myself? I don't care/mind. They aren't hurting anyone and with so many people on the Earth who are so terrible, I see no reason to raise a fuss about a man making out with his Mustang.
I'd have to put my bets on Sora+Simba. Simba's roar was so OP'd to me in the first KH game. I loved him because of it and made him my main summoning when I could. Sora's my favorite simply because of his keyblade talents. And also, wisdom drive. >> And Mickey, because he fights just like Yoda.
i used 2 wndr wat friendship culd b!
//hanged man//
Britishism has my vote. The fact that it was a promise and she was fufilling it for a friend sake was just beautiful in itself. It was short. It was simple and it was to the point. Yet it conveyed all the emotions needed to make me think that if it were a book, I would not be bored. Good job, bro.
>> I WAS SO EXCITE. He loves you so much that he couldn't wait for your real anniversary. Which is in three hours for me. :^D
>> Why what?
Call me asap. Why? I miss you.
Every month me and Jayn celebrate our anniversary in some way on the 25th of each month. Because of how hectic things have become recently I have no ideas at the moment, and for that I am sorry. Just wanted you to know, Jayn, that I haven't forgotten. I love you.
You may have THREE parts (THREE lines), and a maximum of THREE people can sing one part together--EXCEPT for the lines in [brackets]. Those are solos, so only one person can claim those. This rule may be changed depending on how many people are interested. There are a lot of parts, to give people more opportunity to join. THIS RULE WILL BE LIFTED AND RETURNED TO THE NORMAL FOUR PARTS (OR MORE) AFTER A COUPLE OF DAYS. It works as a sort of cap to give more people the chance to join without it filling up instantly, though it might anyway. These Kawaii Desu things here --> { ♥ } <-- are for duets. Only TWO people can claim those. The lines in black should be recorded by everyone. ((Just a reminder. :l)) This is Halloween, this is Halloween.
o: I'll do the chorus for you. Since you'll know why.
