Search Results

So today in Cannibalism International Thread...

Not really important or interesting enough to discuss.

Oy vey ...

Llavefest 2013 is gonna be so epic this year guys!

Well departing and coming back in less then a week is very unusual.

Is it impossible to understand why it is likely to feel surprised?

I have an entry to still hand in eventually, i've had a cold over the weekend and all the gunky stuff had stuffed me up but i think i'm well enough to sing again!

I'll be ready asap!

And ooo i'm first! : D

Because both classes explore the other one in them? Politics discusses the economy, Economics discuasses public sector, government intervantion in the market and so on. Having a single one is enough, putting both forward into a single class is in-depth and usually something explored at University level.

Also, you say the government should do their jobs and economists? That's the governmnets job, to govern. Laws are put in place, healthcare to attend and manage, create a free education system, organising the people into a single cohesive unit, offering job support and training, and all of this requires funding, money. Since these goods and services go to everyone in a sovereign state, taxes are put in place in order to make these things both affordable and/or free.

The government employs economists to reason the best public sector legislations possible. It's not as if they make random guesses, they make informed decisions and put it forward to politicians about the best possible outcome for the public.

Also economist bankers aren't exactly in high standing in recent years. The taxpayers had to save banks around the world when the government intervened, saving several bankes after making stupid decisions that are reckless. If the government hadn't been there to save the banks, our economies would've effectively stalled and crashed, and maybe we would've had anarchy, but that's after all the chaos and destruction. But the economy would effectively be dead. Economists are not flawless at their jobs.

The government is latched to the economy, any economist will tell you that. They are symbiotic at this point, and if ones was to go, so will the other.

That's not quick enough for me Llave!

I like my men to be faster then a speeding bullet! : p

A Llave part is a dead party.

Tumbleweed everywhere.

No seriously, you won't regret it. Or if you do, well we liked it!
: )

Apparently the Razor's edge addition was more in line with the past titles gameplay wise, which may mean I get this game when it's reduced in price.

Fighting games have always been a 'buy when reduced in price' affair for me.

Hold the phone... You birthday is not on June 1st is it?

And Ninjask all da way!

No problem. It's just good to get a wide idea and question down when posting a topic, you did good wih the edit.

Now, at the topic.

It is something interesting to think about, that 'truth' is a google away. But the thing is these wikipedia articles and such are still no good indication of facts and kids should be told this.

But in terms of maturation, i honestly don't think this'll change much. Other cultures don't have a Santa Claus or an equivalent and their population sill matures at an average age across the world. It can seem that people will now not believe in these old folk tales with obvious information a click away, but remember that people still believe in the same things we've been believing for thousands of years. Ghosts, spirits, the afterlife, people believe what they don't understand even if they have information available, it doesn't mean they will read it.

So I don't believe anything will really change, few individual kids might leanr this way but i don't think it will mean maturity will happen at a greater rate for kids.

Please, could you edit your first post and add a discussion topic, and clearly state what you want us to discuss.

Otherwise i'll move this to Spam.

: 3 c

Alright let's look at this.
This guy has cheated on a girlfriend with you without telling, shown affaction towards you after the girlfriend who cheated on him (technically he cheated first with you, might have been revenge), is dating another girl for valentines and hasn't made a move on you in over a year.

I've seen this type of person before, they usually rely being in a relationship no matter what, they love and crave affection. Typically they cheat on their partner, blame it on them and continue seeking new partners.
Honestly Enzy, the evidence likely means he'll cheat on you. Believe me, you don't want to be cheated on by a serial cheater, you don't deserve it.

My advice? Don't get into a relationship. It might be a nice few months in the summer, but as soon as you go off to uni, he'll be cheating on you, if not before. Or he'll just end it saying he can't handle long distance relationships when he already has someone else up to date, and find out months later he was cheating on you. Have fun with him as a friend but don't get emotionally hurt in the end just because you get attracted to this guy.

No problem. We all learn new and different stuff each day.

Just keep on topic guys, thanks.

You're confusing it. Acting effimenate or 'camp' is not a homosexual trait, it is a stereotypical one of a homosexual man, but just because you are effiminate does not mean you're gay. I can act camp, but i'm not gay, just because you act a certain way doesn't mean you fit into a catergory like being a homosexual.

Like for women, the stereotype is that they are bad drivers. But that doesn't mean all women are bad drivers or that men aren't bad drivers. It's stereotypical to presume women are bad drivers, like it's stereotypical of a homosexual actig 'camp'.