(hey) Here's my question. Who hyped up Krowley as a "good player" so we felt his loss when he was killed? I feel like that maybe, just maybe, the mafia team were trying to hype up Krowley for this blow. If we can figure out those, maybe we can get a clue? I remember at least @Mish doing this
This is nice being theatrical with everything and having fun with the phoenix wright stuff but I feel this is beginning to isolate some of the others from posting and making it easier for people to not pay attention to the conversations beforehand, like with people talking about Mish, Cal, Al, and Midnight. Now we're on Tale, and I feel like we need to focus on the other's as well (i think everyone is busy today though from what I remember)
I mean, looking at it, the mafia might also have gotten rid of Krowley simply because he wasn't very active. It's just the fact that he wrote an analysis that may have thrown us for the loop. There are so many reasons the mafia could have done it, but I wonder if the intent would have been too obvious if it was to use you guys as lynch bait.
While I do agree with your analysis on this, I'm not sure why you are jumping to cover Al so quickly. Yes, you explained possibilities of what he could be doing if he was in a mafia, but you said "90% likely to be town". That is taking an extremely huge gamble this early on for the sake of your friend. Even if you know how he may usually play, how do you know he might not be taking a tactic you aren't familiar with? I mean I don't know how Al plays generally, that's a benefit you have that some of us don't.
The scripts you sent I can already tell will be very helpful in the future, thank you for that. I can't imagine how much work they took to make...
There is no blue number of replies? Are you sure that isn't a staff thing?
Still? I don't remember you pointing this out before. But I understand where you're going with this, but wouldn't always being in agreement be a little obvious? I'm not saying I don't see we're you're coming from but I think they're playing mafia stupidly if that's the case... but maybe it's that stupidly playing mafia that makes it so brilliant.
...Did I say she at any point?
I believe he was trying to show you admitted your mistake to Cal, who seemed to miss it.
I'm gonna bat on the other side and ##Vote G-dog since I feel like Blaine's mistake was more of a genuine mistake and I don't think it'd be best to knock him out just for that. It's round 1, if he gets more suspicious then I'll feel more worried.
It could. You never know what someone could write that they regret later. I know I regret stuff I wrote in some mafia games.
It may be a rule on other sites but it's not a rule here. Please respect that. It's not so much a cheated thing so much as what you could have done, even if you didn't.
I know it sucks but you still can't edit to finish a sentence. It's why I posted after accidentally posting only a quote earlier.
well, could you make it default color so it's easy for it to stand out in your posts I guess? And I get what you mean, and we don't really need to "clean house" in a rush on day 1, though I know games that like to just get day 1 over it.[DOUBLEPOST=1467231847][/DOUBLEPOST] If he meant finish up I misinterpreted it as getting rid of useless players.
please stop posting your two word agreements that contribute nothing, because it really is starting to make me wonder what you're trying to accomplish and it is starting to make me thing you may be mafia. really. going along with the crowd and just being a 2 word commenter doesn't help the town in any way and makes it hard to analyze what you are writing. I get english isn't your first language but seriously.
shoot okay I'm posting here I accidentally entered okay so what I was going to say was I don't think thats necessarily a good route for suspicion because someone has to drop a name. I'd worry more about bandwagoners admittedly.
Probably not, I wouldn't be afraid of voting. It's just very unnecessary to hard lynch someone on day 1. Even if people want to push to end day 1 awkwardness early I find that hard lynches are for those occasions where people feel absolutely certain about someone or if there's a limited number of people left and a hard lynch is imminent. Ya know? So don't be afraid to post a vote on day 1 even if your only suspicion is that like... Cal stole your musical cd set or something stupid... obviously you should try to be a little more in depth but... eh.... day 1 sucks.
'Sup guys. If anyone is wondering about notification unreliability, it's because a lot of people double post because of the no edit rule and it makes it so you have to click the thread again on that person's. I figured this out after the last few games. Anyway. Day 1 is always a problem because of the nothingness we know so today's the day we are more likely to lose an innocent and not really connect a pattern even if we luck lynch a mafia member, and since as of right now Kingdom Hearts530 hasn't posted at all yet and there's a day left. If they don't post to even start a dialogue I get a little concerned by how progress will go. There are those games where people barely talk and you really can't gauge anything so you're stuck guessing and (ugh I'm sorry but it's a little annoying). Since it's the start it's more forgiving. And I would have voted with everyone else but we're already on 3 for him. So I think I'll try and not vote my first post and just see if he posts. Though there is someone else who hasn't been. I'm wondering if G-dog will post. I'd vote but again I don't want to vote on my first post in here. I just wanted to convey my first thoughts and say hey. (Midnight Star posted just ahead of me, don't follow the thread, just check the thread as often as you can to see new posts in case of the double post thing. Also Midnight pointed out G-dog which I was gonna do but I already wrote a paragraph and it's too early in the morning to rewrite)
Sure, that's fine. I noticed I was a tad late there and figured that's just what happens. But sure, I'll sub if anyone has to drop.
