Search Results

Am I the only one who actually understood what KS meant?

That's actually what I was getting at. It was an either/or question with a single right answer.

I was way too torn between Chris and Nate.

This^. She doesn't even really need the freak mutation accident. If she finds a a pair of nun-chucks...

I know the feeling.

Archer's wrong.

I hear he's in talks to play Spike in a live-action movie.
(HELP ME START THIS RUMOR, KHV)

Is it really ironic or was it my main inspiration?

You can't tell me The Rock isn't a brony. He'll introduce the show to the Autobots who become Autobronies and establish a Cybertronian religion based around the show. Spin-off into a Beast War's styled Transformers series: Pony Wars.

Not saying I disagree with you. I just wanted to point out that the practice is extremely and obviously commonplace and while it is a reason to not make a sequel, I personally don't see it as a necessary reason to not make it. It's how bad sequels are made, yeah, but some good ones come out when they shouldn't have been made. Other good ones explore other aspects of the universe or different times, etc. while leaving the previous storylines alone.

Allow me to introduce you to the entertainment industry

I've been in one online relationship (with someone from here, no less) and I'm...glad I did it. Most of the older members here may recall it, but I don't know if you're aware it was my only DTR'd online relationship (DTR? oh god, I've been watching too much Awkward). I really did care for her and she definitely knew me on a level no one else has ever gotten to. I've been in similar relationships online, but nothing I would actually call boyfriend/girlfriend, aside from the one I just mentioned and I really don't see where any of the bad press actually comes from (assuming that both sides are being truthful about who they are. I'm not talking about the all-too-common scenarios where either party is lying for whatever reason, though I have seen a couple of those). In my experience, it's a true relationship and it doesn't even have to involve face to face interaction. I firmly believe two people can meet online, either through a dating service, social media site, or even something like this forum, and be happy and true to each other. The problem is that, as a different type of relationship from an irl relationship, it has its own problems. The fear of being catfished (though actually videochatting and, in some cases I've seen, actually visiting each other gets rid of this), the difficulty of being faithful, difficulties of being in communication (mine was on a different continent; time zones killed us), etc.
That said -and I know I might get some negative feedback for this- I think irl relationships are just...better? Better isn't the right word. I mean, a relationship that becomes offline (moving near each other and actually seeing each other in person, for example) after being online for a while I consider to be a -as you called it- local relationship. Relationships that stay on line, I don't think end in a happily ever after without becoming offline first. The experience is different and the physical interaction is just...great to have. Physical interaction isn't entirely necessary for a healthy relationship, but I think it's a huge contributing factor.
Unfortunately, the stigma behind online dating is just embarrassing and it shouldn't be, but there are dangers out there, and...I don't know. Any time I mentioned "online dating," I mean specifically having a relationship over the internet, not through a dating service, and with both sides fully aware of who the other party is.

Using this script and it works really well. I've been going around giving everyone nicknames (usually what I know them by unless they're non-premium). Also, just gave myself a nickname lol. Recommend this for anyone who wants a nickname field.

It does and I hate it, but the trend's going to continue until more people post outside of here. Threads help, but it's the replies that matter. How many times has a new game or movie been announced and a thread is made in the appropriate section, is seen, and then someone posts another thread about the exact same thing in Spam instead of simply replying to original thread. Hell, I've seen people post something extensive in one of the threads, then post something brief in the other with a link to "my more detailed post" in the other thread.

[DOUBLEPOST=1403915127][/DOUBLEPOST]

Doesn't work on her playstation correctly. It's like...a third of the speed. Thanks though.

I'm trying to find a website to catch up on season 2 from my roommate's playstation, but none of them are playing correctly B |

Never mind. Not happening.

Interview with Tim McIlrath

****, I need to go finish Season 2 of Korra. Episode 3, let's do this.