Search Results

You forgot the thing about liking turtles.

I enjoy how Geoff has kept his composure. He makes a prime spokesperson. Every other representative has lost themselves and ended up looking like an idiot on camera.

I really don't see how a potentially more serious and indepth story would cause it to be rated T.

I was still a kid after I learned about sex. In the right context it doesn't warp your mind.

Onimusha for me and yousa.

The default machine guns were fun, but the game takes a complete flip after that first level. haven't I shown you the nonsense they come up with?

You fight a Darth Vader rip-off on the 5th stage.

Well since any action has an infinitely probable facilitation most are indeed inclined to the idea of multiple branches in the time-space continuum.

That's not the issue at hand. Both extremes fail, and in most cases the child that is "too dumb to listen" is that way because of their parents approach. The fact is that rules should be implemented and enforced with understanding. Simply associating a smack with an action out of turn doesn't promote any real learning; the child is just conditioned to an authoritarian style of parenting. Even explaining afterwards to the child that they were hit because they did something wrong still doesn't explain the hitting. The relationship between "right" and "wrong" still becomes governed by a fear of being hit. This can cause a great deal of stress in child for fear of screwing up and therefore comes to effect self-esteem. If punishment is to be given, an ultimatum does nothing but become a provocation and lazy approach. Affecting the child's world directly through secondary associations like removing TV or video game privileges hits much harder all the while maintaining that he/she is still liked and loved.

It should be interpreted as a way to open doors for people so that they actually have the skills to compete with any other human being for a job irregardless of race or ethnicity. This issue is how it can be taken advantage of.

As funny as it is to watch this, it might as well be made clear. The logic of your argument is being satirized. Assuming that sex-ed will increase the desire to have sex in children is the same as assuming that learning about geography will cause people to want to see it up close. It's not like they're going to be handed a half-assed understanding- it's called sex education because it places the subject in a context that can be understood and provide a basis of information to scaffold knowledge from.

This just proves that idiots can exist among academics (this is quite comforting in terms of my chances). If my life works out to a T, I for one would not mind advocating for the use of video games and proactivity throughout my career.

I have to hand it to Fox though. They were actually taking a stab at being rational by discussing the role of parents. Considering the stance of the psychologist playing devils advocate, there's art more traumatizing in most galleries around the world that depict the human form is more lustful and grotesque ways. She was also an artard about the study she presented about "teens who haven't had experience can't comprehend". Please, lets try to give a little more credit to the teenagers of this world (50%, being boys, that we can safely assume have been hiding the fact that they masturbate from their parents). Most studies that depict a lack of understanding or wrong perceptions about the world can be easily dispelled if a brief explanation follows. With that in mind it all comes back to the parents taking a proactive role in their children's lives. It's impossible to shelter them from everything so it's more often than not a necessity to, taking this subject in mind, talk to the kid about how sex is a way that grown adults express their feelings for each other. Instead we have to chase a faceless monster and blame it for our problems.

I loved this show.

'Tis all about the self-control hommies.

The fact of the matter is that it essentially comes to how the information is used and understood. Being a source education its use is solely for the purpose of furthering knowledge in the context of the right aspects that are associated with it. Arguing that a child knows that they didn't just pop out of thin air will increase their chances of having sex is like saying that teaching drug awareness is going to enthuse children into soliciting and using drugs. Just as every child is told that drugs are bad, they're told they exist as a result of sexual intercourse. It's not like they're being taught about foreplay or the natural pleasure that comes from the act, it's simply informing kids that mom and dad had a much larger role in giving them life.

The good thing about Prime was that his character was never evil to begin with. His slip-ups and faults simply came from his immaturity, lack of real guidance and loss of his home. He won't be back soon because his only goal was to find his way home again. Anyone else not enjoy the confusion many have had with this young badass and the actual Superman-Prime from DC 1 Million?

Don't worry Joker you can be a knight now...you can be a knight...

What a ****face. Hook the damn camera up to the tv artard.

And the *******s still haven't given the original creators credit. On another note I'd like to see someone stare straight into the explosion, y'know, without having their system crash.