Search Results

  1. White_Rook
    You've created too steep of a criterion for innocent. We usually refer to them as innocent within the scope of the present situation. By that logic we're all horrible people, which isn't the case as certain actions do not equate to other actions. Even if we are judged within our entire actions there's no real way to characterize an entire human being as being entirely innocent or guilty. Especially when either of the terms can be used in such relative or subjective terms
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 29, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  2. White_Rook
    Who cares? Opinions are like *******s, **** 'em.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 29, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  3. White_Rook
    Valium or sleeping pills would work better for you dude.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 28, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  4. White_Rook
    Post

    A Theory

    I highly doubt this. There are many prospects for help those that are autistic to cope and better integrate into society, but a cue requires an entirely re-worked set of genes. It's simply not possible at the time being.

    While this is an amusing conspiracy, drug companies more often than not enjoy giving us whatever "miracle cure" they find in their labs. The only issue is that more often than not they like to jump the gun, and rather than process their findings through more tests they distribute it right away or go to the media to find a profit. Years later we find out it was doing something wrong, or doing nothing at all. Other than that the only reason we haven't been able to go all out and find a cure for diseases like AIDs and cancer is because 1) Money and funding are always going to be an issue and 2) we can't set up perfect experiments in which there are controls (people who don't get a drug) and treatment groups (people who get the drug). The reason for #2 is that it's unethical to not treat a person. Without placing the proper constraints it's impossible to draw a straight forward conclusion.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 28, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  5. White_Rook
    Post

    Cosplay

    "Don't do it this way?" No, no. We must have stricter standards. An example: Yuna does not pudge out of her clothes. If you pudge out of your clothes, consider a new costume idea.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 28, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  6. White_Rook
    I'll laugh and possibly follow this up as soon as proof of legal age is presented on Reptar's part.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 28, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  7. White_Rook
    Me and Jesus. Not that Hippie fool, the real one with the beard.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 28, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  8. White_Rook
    Who's Cronoking? Oh yes, one of the many people that enjoy my wit and originality. And you don't have to know me to hurt my feelings. Even if such a thing were possible here, knowing me wouldn't some how change the fact that it can't be done.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 28, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  9. White_Rook
    That level has one of the sexiest tracks in the entire game. And that says a lot since all the music for Brawl is awesome to begin with.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 28, 2008 in forum: Gaming
  10. White_Rook
    Nuh-uh. It was like the best game ever. Nothing screams fun like piloting a clunky 3-D black guy with horrible controls, and story, and shooting people for no real reason. The best part is the level where you have to cut the power to the building. How gangsta rap is that?

    On another note, at first I thought he was bashing SOCOM.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 28, 2008 in forum: Gaming
  11. White_Rook
    Anyone hear news on a possible 3rd version?
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 28, 2008 in forum: Gaming
  12. White_Rook
    Animaniacs is the ****!

    Good idea: Saying you like children: "Hey Shirley, I like kids."
    Bad idea: Saying you like specific children: "Hey Shirley, I like 12 year old boys."
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 28, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  13. White_Rook
    Your feelings get hurt too easily. You need to stop that.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 28, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  14. White_Rook
    Post

    Peace

    Utopia implies perfection. It's simply out of our grasp of understanding since we're not perfect. If we were we'd be God.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 27, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  15. White_Rook
    This is redundant. It's no different from asking "Why we exist", and there's already a thread on that...and with that exact same name.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 27, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  16. White_Rook
    If I was forced to choose I would go with being blind. It would offer me a chance to see my common representations in a new light, figuratively of course. The change in perception and possibilities of utilizing touch interest me some what. Still having my hearing would give me an even greater incentive to take up a few instruments as well for a stimulating hobby.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 24, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  17. White_Rook
    Most adults don't find conversation about sex that awkward. In my opinion it seems that the older you get the more it becomes talked about casually, and in retrospect it stops becoming such a big deal. But I can see where you're coming from. Some parents dread trying to work out the details with their kids. But if it comes without any assumption and the motive is purely educative, it tends to be easier and be less awkward for both parties.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 20, 2008 in forum: Debate Corner
  18. White_Rook
    Knowledge, or what we're merely able to make of it at the present, will out "exist" humankind.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 20, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  19. White_Rook
    The fried chicken variable must also be added for this to be perfect. Otherwise biscuits with gravy makes a simple snack.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 18, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  20. White_Rook
    Again, something about cookies. Grow another dimension!

    What can I say? I'm a very judgmental whore.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 17, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone