Search Results

  1. White_Rook
    Down the hatch then!
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 15, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  2. White_Rook
    White_Rook.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 15, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  3. White_Rook
    You're opinion really, but strictly speaking we make of it what we want. In the way that our "soul" is able to shape us we're able to contribute to the "soul". Show a little confidence and talk a little more, you may find things aren't as lonely as they seem.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 15, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  4. White_Rook
    Basically paranoid and delusional schizophrenics would be capable of it to some degree. But nothing like what is being suggested in the topic.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 15, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  5. White_Rook
    I'm going to sue Bruce Lee for martial arts related violence. I'm going to sue every food franchise for the concept of food poisoning. Then I'm going to sue the NFL for making O.J. do it. Then I'm going to sue Mother Nature for violent sharks. Seriously, it was just failure to draw the line between fun and idiocy. Now lets all sing "Blame Japan".
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  6. White_Rook
    I'm going to spank myself and tell me that I'm a naughty, dirty boy.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  7. White_Rook
    Well, fur is often treated with a few chemical bathes before it's processed into an item of clothing to prevent it from falling out, decomposing, and just plain smelling. Chances are another wild animal would be able to know the difference.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  8. White_Rook
    Is this a candy bracelet? Because even if it isn't...eat it.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  9. White_Rook
    Well no one short of being diagnosed with delusional and paranoid schizophrenia would actually be capable to effortfully will something false into something true without truly knowing that it isn't true. Even most patients with schizophrenia don't exhibit something as vivid.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  10. White_Rook
    Well considering that free will and lack of foresight is often a result of much the "bad" in our world, it's not so much we as a select few and not truly knowing any better.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: Debate Corner
  11. White_Rook
    They weren't entirely accurate. It's just remarkable considering what they lacked. Much of it was based on their own mythology as well, so a great deal has been shown to be happenstance.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  12. White_Rook
    Depending on the type of amnesia you won't necessarily even remember these "false" memories.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  13. White_Rook
    The answer is subjective and circular: we exist to define our own existence. You can argue from a theological perspective but it doesn't really get you further than certain aspects of morality.

    Plastic is one of the most amazing human inventions. The Earth wanted it, and so here we are. It's outside the box, and more of a philosophical pun.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: Discussion
  14. White_Rook
    I just found out about all of this right now. H-uh.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: Kingdom Hearts News & Updates
  15. White_Rook
    There's a very high chance that you won't see something like that for at least 3 years. I'm not sure how things are done in the U.K., but in North America it takes at least 3 years for a $60 game to get down to the $20 dollar range. You can check Ebay, but chances are you may just find the game for much steeper prices.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: Gaming
  16. White_Rook
    I'm not sure, but it can't be healthy.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  17. White_Rook
    But it's sooooooooooooo good.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: The Spam Zone
  18. White_Rook
    Well the only standardized forms of finding an I.Q. are through tests. The only issue is that many of them count and discount a wide variety of variables that contribute to I.Q. We can agree on a few things like literacy, problem solving, etc., but there's a great deal of differences between different tests. Other than standard tests you might as well flip a coin if you're measuring I.Q. in another fashion.
    Post by: White_Rook, Mar 14, 2008 in forum: Discussion