Pretty good, brozinski. Playing some musics. And you? We haven't spoken in ages. D:
I like that saying because it's very realistic and true to how the world works. Machiavelli was really saying it how it was, because a vast majority of the time, someone in the real world has to get the short straw for something to happen for the greater good. Obviously if terrible means were taken to attain a lackluster or otherwise unworthy end, then it's not a valid phrase at all. Its validity is very dependent upon the situation.
Saw this ages ago, but it still sends chills down my spine. Okay, not really, but it's funny as hell.
Haha, I was actually just thinking that. =P
Kinda a weird one I thought up. They're song lyrics, but I don't particularly like them; that being said, this is all I've written in months. Hmmm Spark A fire burns A thinker yearns For inspiration As he embarks On an excavation Into the dark Flash He's overcome A conundrum: Where to look first With this great sum Of mental bursts To disprove everyone Glow His strength endures Down to his core The flames rise Burn his pores The mighty pen cries As his proud heart soars Dim All light now dead He rubs his head He gets up Moves to bed Holds his flame's pup And he says, "Hmmm..."
Ohey, this looks like it's sexual just for the sake of being sexual. Isn't there a rule against that? -Locked-
Quick, post some porn and make them freak out. It might distract them long enough for you to get away.
The effect around the focal is pretty cool, I like that aspect of this tag. However, the background is kinda boring, and the fact that there are only two colors makes it even more dull. This tag could be tons better if it had more color in it; it'd liven things up, you know?
I got really excited, then about a quarter of a second later, I remembered that half of them were dead. iTunes loves to play with my emotions.
Charmander. Because Charizard is still, after more than a decade, the shit.
She's recycled Disney fodder: she's nothing but a product of the corporation, but at the same time she desperately wants her music career to be more Miley Cyrus than Hannah Montana. This video shows that pretty clearly in the sense that it's not childish at all and rather irresponsible in my opinion. It's not as if she's been off the set of Hannah Montana for a few years; I know that show is at least still on the air, if not still in production of new episodes. Basically, Miley didn't call this one well at all, and she will never really be anything more than the child pop star that she is now, as exemplified by the reactions to this video.
u think mah naem iz kewt???> :D thank you :):):) urz is kewt 2 hehehehehe if u want ur naem 2 b difrnt color u ned 2 do bad things 4 spdude :( it hurt
lulz mah naem iz bianca, but u can call meh bivi. :D JOHN IS SUCH A KOOL NAEM!!1
ew ur weerd :( stop creeeepin mah profiel... actuly ur prety kool :) lets b frends!!!!1 wats ur naem?
Gah, I'm sorry, that was my mistake. >< I was skimming over the people in the thread who were interested and missed at least three people now. I...
You might have to, though I think my amp can emulate the effect pretty well. I'll see how the quality is.
I'm gonna record the guitar part some time in the next couple of days. Really sorry I didn't do it sooner; this weekend's been a mess.
Well, I didn't want to offend, since my views on why they believe what they believe isn't exactly nice, but you're right, I should stick to the topic. I believe deists fall into one of the following categories: 1. People who were raised as whatever religion they currently are and either don't care enough to reevaluate their views or have had the beliefs drilled into their brains too much to drive them out. 2. People who are afraid of death and/or life, or who just need some kind of answer and aren't willing to go with science's explanations on certain things because it hasn't explained enough yet and/or has an unpleasant ending. 3. People who genuinely believe due to some kind of epiphany or experience in their lives. I don't think most deists can really say that they believe in their religion of choice and in evolution, since most religious texts say that God simply created man on the spot out of nowhere; this goes against a good deal of findings that have started to shed light on a common evolutionary ancestor between humans and apes. I think what these people are trying to do is make people believe that their belief system can be scientifically valid, when in reality it has yet to show any means in which it can be.
True as this may be, everything Rush Limbaugh says is funny.
Was just thinking the same thing.
