Umm... well, I'm a girl, so no, I can't really say I think she's hot XD But I do think she's pretty.
I dislike his RE: CoM voice too. I don't know what happened, but I much prefer his KH2 voice to RE: CoM. He just doesn't sound the same at all. It's a good thing I have the Japanese version XD Otherwise the game might drive me too crazy for me to be able to finish it.
I got mine at play-asia, and Swap Magic at Consumer Depot (I THINK). The whole thing (Final Mix+Swap Magic) cost about $100. Not too bad if you really want the games like I did :)
I love Zexion's Lexicon. No clue why I like it so much, I just find it fascinating XD
I first went into Anti-Form while I was fighting Xigbar. I was out of MP, out of Potions, and I had approximately 3 HP left. But I had enough Drive to go into Master Form, and I decided to try that in order to get back my HP and MP. You can guess how things went from there >.<
Zexion, Demyx, Larxene, and Roxas. Demyx and Zexion are tied for first, then Roxas, then Larxene.
Stitch or Peter Pan. I swear I never could have completed the Hades' Paradox without them. At least, not with the score quota anyway, which was the only reason I was participating in it anyway, Journal Completion.
Dnt mst ppl tlk lk ths nywy whn thyr txtng? Ts rly qt nyng nd dnt knw why ppl d t.
It's a very small detail and if you're paying very close attention you'll most likely miss it. But yes, it's in Port Royal. He discusses consuming alcohol with Elizabeth, and after telling her she's in a ghost story, drink a bottle. The first time I played, I noticed it, but it didn't occur to me that that was the "alcohol" part XD
How is it negligence when we can't do anything about the problem? We are very well aware of the damage Westboro causes, but we're unable to do anything by law. Westboro has the right to express their opinion, however foul it may be. And like I said, some communities have issued permits preventing anyone (including groups like Westboro) from protesting in certain areas (like funerals). So some action is being taken. I also mentioned that a group was actually shut down at one point a few years ago. Like I said, we aren't aiding them. No one's aiding them except other radicals. Most Christians would love to get rid of these people and have tried to many times. But it's not like we can just go up to them and say, "Hey, you're hurting a lot of people. Do you think you could stop?" and they'll listen. They don't listen to us. They don't care what we think about them. We also can't do anything by law, because these people are taking advantage of their rights effectively in order to do what they do. But, yeah. We Christians are just too lazy or don't care enough to fix an easily remedied problem. All we do is complain about it, but we don't do anything to solve the problem, which can be solved quite easily. I suppose, then, that non-Christians doing something about it is out of the question, since they seem to know how to fix it and it's done so easily >_> Seriously, it's not just our responsibility to stop these guys. Why are we the only ones who should try and stop these people? And why are we the only ones who get the blame when they aren't stopped? How exactly am I judging, or implying that Christians have the right to judge? I said we have the right to acknowledge that sometimes, people do judge us. I never said we had the right to judge others. We don't. Nobody has the right to judge anyone. What I did say was that we don't have the right to feel superior or anything when people do judge us. I'm not saying you will burn in hell, either. That's a horrible thing to say and I would never say something like that to anyone. Anyone who says that is either radical or just plain mean. Also, I don't think God really "judges" people. It makes Him sad when people deliberately disobey Him, but He loves all of us just the same (even those who don't even believe in Him). Ahhh... I thought he meant the topic XD I thought it was a pretty good question and couldn't figure out what was wrong with it lol.
I liked all of them except Xaldin. He was the only one I've ever had trouble with, and I've yelled at the game on more than one occasion because of him >.<
No, I don't think it'd be better. It would be harder and that's always fun, but it might end up being too difficult. Not because the Heartless themselves are that hard to defeat, but because there's just so many of them they could stop your movements and attack you without you being able to do much about it.
Triangle: Whatever Item I need, I change it before battles. It's usually Potions, though. Circle: Reflega Square: Any spell except Curaga or Reflega. This too changes according to what I need quick access to. X: Curaga
I second this. It is logical, and I think actually very likely. Days is also probably the most likely place we will learn about Kairi's Keyblade, just because of the setting and the time it took place. I know I've seen this theory mentioned on the Kingdom Hearts Wiki site, but I haven't looked for it anywhere else.
I always choose the sword and give up the staff. I'm not really sure why I do that though.
I think "bittersweet" is the perfect way to describe the ending. It was sad that Kairi and Sora were separated, but some of the events like Kairi finding the drawing in the cave were happy as well.
That's quite sad. I never said there couldn't be repercussions for what someone says. But unfortunately, unless things get violent it is legal for these people to hold protests. They have the right. I also believe communities have the right to issue permits limiting where these groups can go (some already have). Exactly. Are you agreeing with me or trying to contradict me? Nobody wants to protect them. The people who do protect them hate doing so. I believe that's what I was saying before, was it not? If I'm not mistaken, you just proved my point. Thanks. Okay, then. I just wasn't sure, that's all. But now that I know, my opinion on them has just gotten worse. Although, I do only see mention of gays in the first example... I wasn't actually questioning why what they did was stupid. I was wondering why you implied that she was more important as a human than these other people (soldiers, gays, etc). Alrighty, then. But I'd have thought you'd be able to figure out that the Christians who do those things are extremists, like groups who say Harry Potter or Tetris is evil, or groups like Westboro. Hmmm... anyway, most Christians don't do stuff like that. The ones who do are radicals, and they do crazy things, just like radicals in all belief systems (including atheism) do. Religion is not an addiction. Religion is a belief, and in the case of Christianity, a relationship with God. "A religious addiction"... that may not be the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, but it's in the Top 10. If you don't like the 12 step program just because of God, then use a different program. It's not like that's the only program there is. Although it is one of the most helpful (wonder why that is). The only Christians who are excusing what these creeps are doing are other radicals. And like I've already said, these extremists are immensely outnumbered by the rest of the Christian population. Yes, it is the #1 religion, which does explain why religious crimes are generally held by radical Christians. Oh, and there was an incident where a Christian cult was shut down in Texas a few years back. Radical Christians do get stopped on occasion if things get bad enough. Do you get it? This is radical behavior! It's not the majority of Christians! And, ummmmmm... Mormons are Christians :blink: When you use the word "Christian", you're referring to all Christians, not just a certain type. I think I warned you about about making generalizing statements by using "Christian", didn't I? But you ignored it, and now look what happened. You totally contradicted yourself. *sigh* No, you don't get it... Many radical Christians support their behaviors. Many radical Christians think what hate groups are doing is okay. The rest of us think they're all nuts and would like nothing more than to get rid of them. Most of us are willing to (and do) look outside our own circle of religion. Really? That's interesting. I think more non-Christians should open their eyes and see that most of us are in fact against these people. All of us, in fact, except for the radicals! (Do you get it now?) That's the thing, though. It's not a crime unless it gets physical. And it is unnatural cruelty, but it's legal unless violence starts. Okay. Did you actually read anything I wrote? I'll say it one more time: People aren't protecting them. The existence of rights protects them. Nobody's defending them. No one is trying to save these people's butts,, except other radicals (I hope this horse is already dead by now, but just in case I'm going to beat it to a pulp anyway). And all I'm doing is saying that yes, these people have rights. I'm not PROTECTING them. I'm STATING A FACT! It's an unfortunate fact, but a fact. And it won't be Westboro's fault if someone goes on a killing spree. That is the person's choice. They chose to go on a killing spree. "They made me so mad, I just couldn't control myself!" No. You make your own choices. No, it does not. I never said it does. But some Christians feel that way. Others don't. You seem to be only pointing out the worst of us... In some cases, it's a good idea for them to be intermingled, although Evolution is not necessarily one of those cases. What? "Because some people feel it is right?" O-kay... Okay, just checking. Of course I see the harm these people do. So do many other people. That was my whole point. How am I judging? Or is that even directed towards me? I meant completely broken up. As in, they're separated and that's it. No more of those creeps. And how many of those groups have actually been broken up? All I see is are lists of active hate groups. What "others", exactly? No, they shouldn't be allowed. But they are by law. And as I have said before, some communities have permits that limit where these people can protest. Yes, I want other people to lay off them because I am one. That's partially the reason. But it's also partially that people seem to single us out as troublemakers. I am not saying "Oh, woe is me!" I'm simply pointing out the unfortunate fact that, because of what these few radicals do, as a group we are given a bad name. Not throwing a pity party here, just stating the facts. That's what I've been trying to tell you. We have been speaking out against them. Nobody wants these guys around! Actually, I think we have a right to say, "We are misjudged." simply because often we are (not all the time). We just don't have the right to go "Oh, us poor Christians! We're sooo misunderstood! Nobody understands why we're so great!" People (not all, just some) do misunderstand or judge Christians, and I think we have a right to acknowledge that fact without being accused of defending groups like Westboro. We just shouldn't start feeling superior about it because we think nobody understands our greatness and that's why they don't like us. One more thing: how many people have been actually killed by radical Christians as opposed to radical Muslims? I'm well aware of this... I was just saying that there are always some people who will hate someone just because of their belief. I did not say most people; I just said that there are indeed such people. I do not recall saying that there were more of the haters than the tolerators/celebrators, or even that were as many. And I know people want to "get along". I myself am close to an atheist family, and we both respect each other's beliefs and are very good friends. You don't have to tell me that other religions get along; I am perfectly aware of this. We (for the most part) are very well aware of their existence. I have already explained this but you seem to insist otherwise. Oh well, if you don't want to listen, that's not my problem... How do you know "most Christians" have no idea? Do you know "most Christians"? I sure don't, but I think I can safely say that, being a Christian myself and knowing many, many, many, man,y MANY others, that quite a few understand the trouble these guys cause. Not necessarily "most", although I'm willing to bet that most are aware of these problems (but I have no way of knowing if it's most or not. Neither do you, so I suggest you not use that word). You seem to be judging us (as a whole - you have acknowledged that not everyone is like what you said), and yet you are saying we have no right to point that out because then we're just complaining and defending these groups? That's hardly fair. Just because somebody acknowledges that some people judge Christians does not mean we're defending these horrible people or their actions. To sum it up... the reason Westboro is allowed to exist is because of their freedom of speech and religion rights. I don't know how I ended up having to defend Christianity and defend my defending of Christianity, but all that stuff is really irrelevant. What matters is that these people have rights of free speech and free religion, and that's why they are allowed to exist. Not because they're Christian or because a lot of Christians are protecting them, but because of their rights. Also, I'm not sure... but I think I sense an anti-Christian (anti-religion in general, but targeting Christianity) tone in your argument. I could be wrong, but that's just the feeling I'm getting by reading your posts. ... A) You don't spend much time online, then, do you? B) Then don't post in it if it's so ridiculous. And actually, what makes it ridiculous? C) Is it just me, or is everyone disregarding what I'm saying because, to quote Son of Sam's polite and graceful articulation, "Repliku is ****ing incredible"? My post is actually quite intelligent too, if I do say so myself...
Nope, you really can't :)
I never was offended. That was my whole point. That just because I'm Christian doesn't mean this is worth getting worked up over. Obviously I need to work on my subtlety some >>
Okay... O_O Whatever. I have more important things to worry about and be offended by than this.
