Why just Square ? Why didn't they change their name back to Squaresoft ? I'm surprised that the Enix part of the company isn't furious about this. The Enix history is going to be wiped, just because Final Fantasy isn't selling as it did in the 90's. Enix should move away and just let Squaresoft do their thing, epsically if they're planning to swallow up other gaming companies.
They're just waiting for technology to upgrade, so the game can look more stunning and realistic. SE really love to shock the gaming world by showing beautiful graphics in the games they make. It's been a habit of them since FF VIII. :xp:
Tidus all the way bro. Though sometimes I main Prishe, because never playing XI, it's interesting to see what could of been if XI didn't go online.
Mary Poppins lol. " Sora, drink the spoonful of sugar " !, " Sora what terrible clothes you're wearing, somebody would think that you're a slacker ! " In the end Mary takes away Sora's keyblade because it doesn't look proper or gentleman like. xDD
Pocahontas, it seems to be the only one left of the Disney resistance. Also Robin Hood, Jungle Book, and Sword and the Stone would be awesome too. It would be cool to see the Lion King and the Aladdin worlds return in Dream Distance too, since KH 2 had Return of Jafar, it would be cool to see Aladdin's dad, and Aladdin and Jasmine get married, and see Simba's daughter.
Don't believe that it's been 12 years already. Time has gone by really fast.
This may sound dumb, but I hope that it's a animated Kingdom Hearts Disney movie. I can see Squareenix teaming up with the Disney Animation department, and creating a really cool KH 1 movie.
No I don't think that I did. I think I tried a few times and was really keen and tried to fight him whenever I saw the chance, but always lost. I'm mm a bit too reckless me thinks.
This list is made of win. But there is also Fox and the Hound, Bedknob and Broomsticks, The Brave little Toaster, Aristocrats ( which Goofy being a dog, I'm sure he'll enjoy ), Return to Oz, Dumbo, The Three Caballeros, Pete's Dragon, Oliver and Company, Basil the great detective, Goofy Movie, Flubberand Brother Bear. There is heaps of movies to use in the future series !
I like it, it makes her look more powerful and modern. Though I'll get rid of the blue jacket though, it makes her new style look like she's more of a teenager than a mature woman. With just the pants and the red covering, she'll probably look more like a lady rather than a young girl. It makes her look powerful and right for today's generation, but her original uniform even though it may be "outdated" it made her look mature, like a actual woman.
Hiya. Do you want to carry on the debate here ? Or just leave things alone. I tend to want to let things be, and just say that we both had two...
I haven't seen him post anything in days. Which is strange, because he has so many people at the moment to support him on the theory of evolution being a better theory to believe in than creationism. Actually, typing this, I don't think he is cowering away. That forum is a complete joke, it's a troll forum. I don't think that a troll forum counts. Not even in a example. This debate is actually 'creationists are dumb' agree/ disagree ? That's what Pasty Stone started with, anyways. Anyways, I'm pretty agreeable with this statement about the creation.[/QUOTE] To be honest, this is only my second debate in life. I'm still novice in the world of debating and I came here only to mention what Pasty Stone said was wrong. I didn't want to debate creationism or evolution at all. If you want to know about my English knowledge, we are studying Shakespeare's Hamlet and we are just done with Anne Frank. I'm not accusing you of being insulting. I actually think that you ARE being insulting. To me that's insulting, but whatever each to their own. The missing link question was at the very beginning, not right now. What ideas ? My idea was plainly that I disagree with Pasty Stone in saying that creationists are brainless and dumb. If you want my idea, that's it. I want to say that creationists are not dumb, I haven't posted any proof on that because so far it's you and Styx misunderstanding why I'm truly here. How many times, I have I said that I'm here because I believe that people who believe in Creationism are not dumb ? Get the real message. Creationism versus Evolution, I don't give a care. People can believe in whatever they want. So. Do I care ? No. My link was to prove that the seventh day kind of counts. Whatever, just read what Styx said about the seventh day and sixth day logic. He explained it better. This clearly well, (subliminally) means that you want more information from me about why I don't believe in evolution ? well, no. I do have proof tucked away somewhere, but I'm not going to show it you. Why ? Because for the millionth time. I'm here for any sort of creationism versus evolution debate. I'm here to support that people who believe in creationism are not idiotic, like Pasty Stone mentioned. Do you finally understand the memo ?. You can 'question' my intelligence, but I can actually question yours in return. Why ? Because I said that I'm only hear to disagree what Pasty said. I'm pretty sure, I even bolded it in for one stage for you to try and make it clear, but it hasn't dug in yet. If your so sharp, how come you have noticed it ? when it has been a) several times and b) bolded out to you. You may act clever in the subjects of evolution, but reading what other people have said... fail. Oh, lol. Didn't you like, give me a F because you thought I failed at reading what other people have mentioned within the debate ? oh, lol, lol, lol. This is completely classic. I sir, give you a nice F in return. :rockdover: Debates are to make people side with your own view. Nothing about swords, we are not playing Zorro here. Then you should stop being so insulting to what other people say... Uhm. No, just ... no. Have you even read some things that Styx has said ? Hmmmmmm I don't see anything rude here at all. What he listed was true the Bible and Terminator are both works of fiction. When Styx said "Without making a fool out of yourself" he/she meant that his/her argument can't be foiled, or scrunched up. The only way you can foil it up (in your mind) is by throwing away your logic (Aka making a fool of yourself), which is exactly what you did again. I am listing the events I have seen, and if you don't like what you hear then maybe you should try to improve yourself instead of kicking others down.[/QUOTE] You can't even find the things that Styx said that were even borderline insulting.You tried to use a un-insulting example, to try and make it like Styx has said nothing wrong at all. Clever move, it had potential... but it failed. LOL do you want me to choke up in laughter ? and if you don't like what you hear then maybe you should try to improve yourself instead of kicking others down Clearly you're just hear to support Styx, and nothing else. Styx is going around knocking me down everysingle chance he can get, and your like ' your the one kicking people down.' Be a man, grow some pants and stop cuddling somebody else like a baby. BTW. How can I be a sore looser when this debate was retarted from the very day it was born ? To me, winning this debate would be like winning a video game... you've won, but it was completely pointless outside of reality.
It's a debate and I disagree with this statement. I am understanding, I just plain out disagree. I think that he would need to post his own knowledge of proof, it make it his own and not somebody elses. I understand your point, I just a different point of view from your own. Yes. This is true, but I would imagine that a small group of very strong believers would still believe in God. Just like in Final Fantasy X-2 some humans supported Yu- Yevon, even he was proved wrong. [ Since UFO's are alright for a example, I'm guessing X-2 is too.] Like I said before, the seventh day counts. Are we back at little children's school again ? I'm so terribly sorry teacher :.-.: No they just give us porno magazines.:.-.: note the sarcasm here. The way that you were acting and typing before was like you seemed to believe that every single scientist was a evolutionist. About the sixth day, I've answered that already. It was so in-depth 'a person who posts asinine ' wouldn't of answered it back so quickly and with proof, backup to support. Lol. This is such a huge major lie, if I was drinking soda right now, I would be spat all over the computer screen because of the huge laughter. You have insulted my knowledge and intelligence several times. 'Seriously, do they teach you to read in your school?' That is a direct insult at somebody's intelligence. Don't lie Styx. At least your being honest this time. Okay, this your personal opinion and there is totally nothing wrong with that. If you believe that creationism is hollow, then okay. Nothing wrong with that. Yes this is probably most likely to be true. wth. You just said before that your not insulting me. Have you read the rules ? Debates are supposed to be a intelligent chat between two different points of views and its supposed to be a fun debate. Seeing that your a mod and you don't know the rules here, I'm worried. Saying comments like this, are just wrong. Carry on like this Styx and I'll PM a higher moderator to complain. Seriously, this is a debate. Not a tease- thread. . This is copied and pasted from above. Debates are supposed to be a intelligent chat between two different points of views and its supposed to be a fun debate. Seeing that your a mod and you don't know the rules here, I'm worried. Saying comments like this, are just wrong. Carry on like this Styx and I'll PM a higher moderator to complain. Seriously, this is a debate. Not a tease- thread And what the hell is wrong with that ? I can question whatever I want. Good on him. Yet you used a 'bridge' in your modern evolution theory. What's a bridge got to do with modern evolution ? Yes, but you said that God created the world in six days. I've proven to you that God created the world in seven, and the day of rest counts. You seem to enjoy attacking the player. As posted above, you have made insults towards my intelligence several times. Roll with the ball yeah, but if I hear one more insult I'm complaining to somebody of higher staff. Like I've said before, this is meant to be a intelligent debate, and a fun one. At the moment, this debate does not feel fun. wth. This isn't a war, a battle to be won. It's a debate, a discussion. You are acting like this is some kind of important war to be won. It's a debate. Views are bound to cross, and there is going to be some agreeing and disagreeing. You seem to forget that I only came here because what Pasty Stone said was wrong and felt sorry for those who strongly believe in creationism, and I was curious about evolution and wanted to ask about the missing link. This hasn't been. " Evolution is false, because off blah blah of a reason " at the very beginning. Instead of trying to dig knives at me, you should notice why I'm here to begin with.
It's a debate between creationism and evolution so of course, it's going to be talked about. Yes, I've know a few people who have read the Bible differently. And no you haven't said the the bible was a lie, that was just a example how a creationist could be hurt if what they believed in was insulted. I was just saying that a creationist could feel the same way, just like you were hurt when Darwin's intelligence was insulted. No, no, no. I didn't mean it that way. I was saying that Darwin could of been guessing about this theories or making things up. It was a stab at Darwin coming up at the theory of evolution. Not hypothesis in general. Didn't you call it the Lamarckian theory, before ?. This was directed at Styx not you Cyanide. I was commenting about the insults that he was making towards me. I was accusing you of making assumptions about the bible. That's a lie, I do know somethings about it. Otherwise I wouldn't of mentioned the Missing link pages ago.
Yes the Bible is the source behind the thinking of creationism. Styx was mentioning that Evolution has helped scientists change the world, nothing to do with the different groups of science. Yes I have. But the seventh day, even though he rested.Counts. Look up on Google, the seventh day counts. Like this for a example, notice that the person asks why God created the world in seven days and doesn't say six. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_did_God_make_the_earth_in_seven_days_and_not_one So Styx calling my posts asinine was not insulting ? No. I understood. Right, riiight. And I'll use Frodo Baggins from Lord the Rings for my next example. >_> Believe me I've tried. But everything I've posted is either something that ends up being laughed out, or it's just deemed as stupid or worthless. Excuse me, but you have called my posts asinine and have done even more insulting things in reply to the posts that I have made. I could report you to a higher admiration and report all the nasty things that you have said to me. Have you read the rules ? Debates are supposed to be intelligent, but they are also supposed to be fun. And I could report, that a moderator is making this debate look like a tease- thread.
1: Hunchback of Notre dame : This is number one because, I love the music in this movie, from the very beginning the music is a masterpiece. I also love the character Clopin and the rather serious and more mature plot, even though it's a Disney movie. 2: Cinderella: I like how this movie can give a feeling or a emotion that hope can make you a stronger person, and that karma is very awarding if your deserving. Cinderella is also my favourite Disney princess. She was so nice, even to her stepmother who treated her really badly. 3: Aladdin: The movie Aladdin just has a really good storyline, humor, romance. It also has a really awesome soundtrack with Prince Ali, Whole New World. :4 Mulan Mulan is such a good role-model, she's a brilliant heroine. : 5 Hercules : I like this movie, because it can give you a energy to work towards your dreams and believe that "you can go the distance " to get your dream, whatever that they be. (: I seem to like the 'dream-maker' movies and characters, Mulan, Hercules, Cinderella.
So you don't know what to do, to say in return about Pasty Stone's comment. So you make a immature comment about how I don't understand logic. Do you read what the other person is saying above ? I said that Pasty Stone needs to post his own opinion, why he thinks that creationists are stupid because it his own opinion and not somebody elses. You assumed that the bible is a fraud. What has this got to do with you thinking about creationism or evolution ? You made a classic mistake about the bible, which proved that you assume that you think that the bible is a fantasy, not real. Do you understand ? " You clearly haven't read the bible, so you are clearly guessing ".So no, it's not the pot calling the kettle black at all, because your off in a whole entire different subject. I wrote it in clear letters this time, but since you love going into different categories so you can manage to squeeze in a insult, I doubt you'll see it. Lol. You thought that it was only humans who believed in evolution before could become a sciencest. Seriously, you need to make your mind up. Even more lols. Just because you haven't seen a creationist bash evolution doesn't mean that it has actually happened. It's a wide world out there. This is what I said before. You made a classic mistake about the bible, which proved that you assume that you think that the bible is a fantasy, not real. Do you understand ? " You clearly haven't read the bible, so you are clearly guessing ".So no, it's not the pot calling the kettle black at all, because your off in a whole entire different subject. I wrote it in clear letters this time, but since you love going into different categories so you can manage to squeeze in a insult, I doubt you'll see it. Pot calling the kettle black ? :/gasp: Yes, but it's half the list and not the full entire list, was it not ? It's true. You don't know what your speaking about. You don't even know that the world was created in seven days, not six. Come on, even school children know that God created the world in seven days. You think that something is fake and you haven't even read through a proper chapter. Lol. You're doing the exact same thing. Try and think of a decent insult, that you are not performing yourself. It comes out as being hypercritical. If you have actually read the bible, you would know that the Romans tried to kill baby Jesus and want him dead, not believe that Jesus was the Messiah. They didn't want Jesus to be the Messiah. That it's a clear solid difference. Not wanting isn't the same as not believing. Sigh. Again, I can say the same for you. You have said that the world was created in the world in six days twice.. Again, you can't think of what to say in return so you twists things around so you can make a insult to the other debater. Sigh. Lol. I understood your point, you commented on your last post that you believed in the buildings being real but you don't believe that those certain places ever actually had a certain place within the actual bible. You gave vaild examples of works of fiction to back your point up ?!. HA, HA, HA. Rofl. So the Terminator and UFOs now count as solid examples. Yes, and I'm sure that any other highschooler could come up with a better "solid example". That's because. A) You haven't really even read the bible, yet you stubbornly seem to believe that it's false 'just because' you assume that it's not reality because of science. B) Your logic is never going to be shaken because it's too arrogant. C) Your replies to the agurements are just basically immature insults. D) You seem to AGAIN, assume. You assume that I'm a hardcore creationist when I've mentioned countless times before that I only came into the topic because was offended by Pasty Stone's comment about creationists being retarted and I've mentioned several times that my side to the debate [ was originally ] that people have free right to believe in what they believe in, and nobody is 'brainless' for believing in something different from evolution. Yes I've insulted Darwin and the theory of evolution but only because I was being insulted in return. Lol. hilarious coming from somebody who used UFOs and a 90's fantasy robot movie as a 'solid example.' Okay then. Prove it. Yes and the world is how old ? You would think if the planet earth was that ancient another evolution transfer would of occurred by now, at least. Even if the first group of apes where from a different category, there is many different types of apes that exist in this world today, if evolution was real I'm sure another group of apes would begin to branch off into the beginning stages of human evolution, therefore more humans from apes would be created. Yet, the earth is millions years old and another transformation has not occurred. Odd, much ? A creationist might feel the exact same way when you brush off the bible as being a fantasy and their lord and savior not being real. Now you know how most of them feel when you call Jesus a lie to them. To them Jesus is the whole entire world, a second father. Do you understand, how people who believe in creationism could be hurt by this, just like your hurt by me calling Darwin a understudy sciencest ?. Well he made up a theory of how life works from his own imagination and his mind. Clearly, Darwin liked the theory that was created from Lamarckian and he doubled up upon it. Just because Lamarckian had ideas about human evolution and Darwin liked and followed his ideas, doesn't mean that either any of them are both correct. This is just something that you highly believe in. You believe that evolution is important and necessary. It doesn't mean that everybody else does, and I'm sure you can teach biology without evolution, I'm no biology teacher but biology isn't just based upon the theory of evolution you know.[/QUOTE] I've highlighted what is just really a huge assumption. Are you are a sciencest ? No, you are just a student so how would you know everything about scientists ? Like Styx above you, don't assume things which you seem to think is knowledge when in reality anything could be happening. Furious much ?. It's just a debate with somebody else having a different opinions or standpoint from your own. If you think that somebody elses opinions are asinine, then you are no different from Pasty Stone. Who most people, want a apology from.
He does need to post proof of this debate, because he hasn't posted his own reason why he believes in creationism not being real. If he has his own opinion, then he it's good to back up the reasons why he believes in his opinion. Posting other people's proof of the agurements is not posting his own opinion, it's copy and pasting somebody elses. It would be like saying. "I believe in evolution, because somebody else said that it was real. " Which is no proof of any backup. You do realize that not all sciencest are evolutionist believers right ??. That bridge could of build by a creationist quite easily. Saying that all science and all sciencest are based on evolution is a bit naive and closed minded. Yes, even some of those science magazines that you read could be written from a creationist. Your science, or biology teacher could even be a creationist. So how naive. The complaint is that Pasty Stone called Creationists retarted, stupid and brainless. It has been mentioned several times. Even by other Evolutions believers. Well the same goes for evolution. Do you really trust your whole believe on a whole bunch of random science, that hasn't been fully proved yet. Do you rely your whole faith on evolution on some random person who went to a beach and spent hours looking at animals move ? He could of been insane. Seriously, he looked at animals and he GUESSED that animals can evolve. Darwin's theory of evolution, is a theory. The bible has more than one author, that probably weren't bored or crazy. You say that the bible authors were pulling out crap out of their buttocks but the person really doing that was Darwin. I can say return trusting a man who was completely doing guesswork is more of a stupid thing to do. At least the bible can give other people hope in life. Evolution. " Wow, we were all monkeys " ! Wow, amazing. Lol fail. This is solid proof that you haven't read the bible probably, and you are just "assuming" that the bible is a lie. You go ahead and a "assume. " It says and mentions in the bible that many people have witnessed Jesus's events and the magical and amazing things that he did while he was alive. With so many witnesses, I doubt that Jesus was just a normal human. During the ages of the bible, lie or make up random stories and you would be dead within a few days. People who broke the law of Moses [ which are the ten commandments ] you would of been punished and then quickly stoned. Even if you don't believe in Moses or the commandments, the laws back in the old days were still quite heavy and you still would of been stoned. Making or creating a "Fairy Tale " book [ in your opinion, the bible ] wouldn't go down well in those decades of times. I want to stay that Nostradamus was almost punished for trying to create his book on prophecy which is many years before the bible or the beginning. So you can say that humans changing into apes was common back in cavemen times/ age ages ?. The Ice age/ cavemen area was millions of years ago. Tell me what human you have seen changed into a ape lately ? At least there is solid proof that crucifixion was common back in older periods. So you look at any kind of proof that is not based on evolution and you believe that it's some sort of a fairy tale. Jesus could come from the sky, tell you in person that he's real and you still wouldn't believe in anything. -__- That's strange. Because you seem to enjoy Darwin's storytelling !!. Alrighty. You hang on to your theory of evolution and I'll hang on to my bible and when we both die we'll see who really was not so smart for hanging on to what we believe in. As far as I see it. You have a bunch of papers and I have hope and faith. If holding on to some kind of ray of hope is stupid then thinking positively must be too. If you don't have hope then what is the point in believing in really anything ?!?. Also since you seem to believe that people who are scientists, all believe firmly in evolution. Here is a list of famous scientists who believe in creationism. http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/sciencefaith.html Again. Sciencest can be creationists too. I don't mean to say that science isn't helping the world, because it is helping the world. :)
It's only a debate. I don't care that much, but I'll reply.
So do you agree with what Pasty Stone was saying ? That humans who believe in creationism are stupid, dumb and completely brainless ? Because that was what he was saying in general. I just believe that humans have the right to believe in whatever they desire, and they shouldn't be thrashed or insulted for doing so. How would you feel if you a group of people commented that people who believe in Evolution are idiotic and stupid, you would feel hurt right ?. Quote Pasty Stone. That is such an insult to knowledge and truth that it makes me feel ill. What Pasty Stone mentioned about museums had nothing to do with teaching biology, or the difference between history or science museums. What he said was another insult thrown towards humans that believe in something differently. Which is closed minded, and I believe isn't right. Sure, we can't all hold hands under the rainbow, but insulting what somebody else believes in isn't really that cool. People could get offended. " Stupid Christians" was what basically mentioned at the beginning posting. Have you even read the bible ? The authors in the bible are mentioned each chapter name. Joshua, Paul etc. They are the ones who have written the stories and the occurring throughout the bible chapters. Proof that the bible is real, well sciencest have found something that they believe that is Jesus's grave for starters. Not to mention the torture cross that they used to tortue Jesus was used commonly during that period of time. And more. http://www.facingthechallenge.org/arch.php @JedininjaJZ.Your using the example of prayer as a scientific example, but you said not to call Evolution as a science because it works differently but creationism doesn't work like a science like evolution. Praying has done just as much healing and protecting, science has helped but it's not like praying has done nothing at all to protect this earth and it's people. Though do agree that Pasty Stone should apologize for calling Creationists retarted and dumb.
