Well last gen, we complimented the Xbox 360 controller for being better than the PS3 Boomerang design, as well as the blue ray disk tray of the PS3. And you take those features for granted, ha, think about it, the Kinect is a way to be controller-less on a console and is an obligatory bundle, MS promoting the change of how we interact with games, and even the Occuls Rift which eliminates camera controls completely. And with the inevitable change to online downloads, physical disks will not be around forever so the disk tray will be discontinued on consoles, one day.
40 Yuan? Come on, it's the future currency of the world.
How am I still top? Bizzare! Alright, i'm pumped for the next. I kinda think I might just do a song anyway, because i really wanna do one. Gah, so excited!
...
£69.99 plus postage and packing.
You've got a computer. Write something. Let your imagination go wild.
Taxi might be the only option.
Costed 70 UK pounds. It costed that much. I actually really like that word now. Costed. I shall name my child that.
1. Forgot the name did it off the top off my head. First, no one can say which games will stay exclusives and which won't, not even the developers, and speculating they will be ported is far fetched and a shot in the dark, an building people's hopes up without any grounding to them. What we do know is that they are exclusive to the Xbox One, that is hard fact and not changing unless officially confirmed. No one could've predicted Mass Effect would be released on PS3 5 years after being originally released for the Xbox 360. I doubt many gamers will wait that long for an exclusive to port. And I say 'better' instead of better because like I said, it's up to the individual, like I explained, and I also explained that it was 'better' because it offered more of a range of genres and originality than the PS4 line up which are almost all sequels. 2. Because SmartGlass is an already established feature of the Xbox 360 and the features it has will carry over along with upgrades, whilst Sony have not shown their tablet service at all. MS have proven they have a good service, whilst Sony is unproven, from what we know currently. The WiiU isn't tablet integrated, so the XboxO having it is a pro compared to that, if you want some type of reason. I'm just listing new features. 3. Except that MS are focusing on a multi media console, whilst PS4 is mainly focused on gaming. The multi media features are likely to be more extensive and prominent on the XboxO than the PS4, because that's how they're focusing their efforts. 4. Homogenous, most likely true, but just listing the features, and for many this is a pro feature, not a con one. 5. See 4. 6. I already explained that in my post. 7. Because almost every developer and their mother has claimed there is no major difference and that it doesn't matter in how they are designing games. It'll be like designing for the same console, sure on paper one is more powerful, but if developers aren't creating games utilising the full capabilities of a system, it doesn't matter what platform it's on, in the end. We've never seen two consoles so evenly matched before, so this will really reflect things in game design. I would get all the articles I could, but I can't be bothered to search anymore than these: from Kojima, from RedLynx, and from Watch_Dogs producer. 8. All the capabilities of the current Kinect and more? I already listed a number of features, needless to say the Kinect i a powerful piece of kit in terms of controller-less gaming, with it able to detect shoulder shifting, finger waggling, to have better voice command options and identify you from your face and voice, logging you into your account automatically, along with the ability for you to navigate your games using nothing but your body. I didn't say you had to like it, but compared to the Playstation Move, this thing has more abilities and possibilities. Look at Project Spark, that thing obligatory requires a Kinect, and the game looks amazingly entertaining and only capable because of the Kinect. To note, i'm getting a PS4, because it fits me more than it does the One, but I'm not going to hate on it completely. Sure some features aren't great on it, but the PS4 isn't perfect. It's all about preference and i'm just trying to list the facts instead of bashing one and loving the other
Thanks for the new pin Chev and welcome back to the Pins!
So swords are officially a thing in the Pokémon universe? I feel like they could've made it more animalistic or at least have more 'cute' or appealing features, because of the whole ancient spirit which should make it a bit more human in some way? Might just be me, but if you make Pokémon out of real objects, you should make them less object like and more alive.
I don't find it stupid, I just find it extremely minimal and pointless, though I do kind of support this type of thing. I like the idea of gender neutrality, to a point, in legal documentation since gender can be a defining factor on the information in the document. But outside of that, it seems ridiculously superfluous. One of the things I find annoying about sexist claims is that words are subjected to scrutiny that are not exclusively gender centric. I hear postman, I think of the title as someone who delivers the post to my house, not specifically a man delivering to my house. More in depth, I find 'man' to be an acceptable middle ground for both genders, since 'man' and 'woman' both share the common 'man' term within the gender identification name. Unless the specific prefix of 'wo' is needed for whatever reason, 'man' by itself is a shorthand I can agree with. I personally use the term 'man' in the context of 'human' or 'humanity' when speaking or writing, and I never contribute it to mean the male gender. When I mean the make specifically I say 'that man', 'a man', 'men', etc. If I am referring to a specific individual or group with the use of man, then that's what I mean to be male. It's just a little out of hand at times how much we are told to be corrected in problems a small few see as a problem. But people cave in because they don't want to be labelled as racist, sexist, or just generally offensive.
I'm going to go with pros and cons, since having just one is a bit useless to make a decision on it. Pros: - Hardware Bundled Kinect, controller-less handling, facial recognition, voice commands Xbox SmartGlass allows connection of tablets to the Xbox One Upgrade of the 'best' controller on the market, better use of vibration functions Blue ray disk drive - Software 'Better' exclusive games (Dead Rising 3, Forza, Project Spark, Titanfall, Ryse, Fatal Instinct, etc) but that's individual choice, though on average they are a bit better in terms of originality, scope of genres and use of the system's abilities Kinect game integration, specific to each game from Kinect Sports capturing your image and creating a cartoon avatar of you in the game, or the ability to move your body to dodge attacks whilst attacking using the controller. SmartGlass, allowing unique features and extras from games along with a tablet screen controller and other upgrades. Dead Rising will use it as a walkie talkie to receive missions and call in air strikes, The Division will use it as a way for tablet players to help console players by spotting enemies, calling in air strikes, etc. Media interconnectivity and able to have multiple application open at once (TV, Skype, games, etc) without stopping any of them. This can even mean queing for a multiplayer game on one hand whilst playing another game whilst you wait (e.g. whilst waiting for matchmaking for a game of Fatal Instinct, you can switch to Ryse and play the singleplayer mode until an on screen prompt tells you a mathc in Fatal instinct has been found Ability to record and upload game footage to Twitch, as well as live streaming Cloud storage of multi media files and save game files Use of Windows apps (though need to b converted by app makers to use on XboxO, a short and simple process) Cons: - Hardware 'Less' powerful than PS4 (likely won't affect quality of gams since they are pretty much the same spec) Bigger than a PS4, dimension wise. Some pics for reference, here is the box on a desk, here it is from a top-ish angle of it to the PS4 and here it is standing, compared to current and next gen consoles. Higher price than the PS4, likely because of the bundled kinect which adds more functions than the PS4 Need to have the Kinect plugged in for games to play, but can be switched off at any time - Software Pay for online multiplayer (PS4 does that too now) Honestly, it's a PS4 with different bells and whistles and it's up to which you prefer at this point since they both have the same system since MS went back on their Always Online policies.
I do wonder why people stay if they feel the place isn't as good anymore. Maybe the myth of never leaving KHV for good is true.
Well this is strange.
"Looks to be a solid 8/10" is my guess of Titanfall. Destiny is going to be the better game, but Titanfall will probably just be the more 'fun' game. And these people can balls off. Best Original Game? You have the parkour of Battlefield, Jetpacks of Halo, Mechs of *insert mech genre game here* and the play style of CoD. I can't even think fo the first original bone in the whole demo. Second Son looks impressive, but it's animations seem very.... old. You would expect characters to move a bit more naturally and a bit more varied in such a realistic looking game. It really makes me kind of, lose the experience of it and I keep second guessing it. Best Trailer is KH3 with MGSV just slightly behind
Hellooooooooo teenage mothers.
For those of you that blinked.... nothing has changed, I swear! Move along.
I'm posting here because i've genuinely forgot my own post count. EDIT: Wow, catch up boys and girls!
Fixed for punchy pun fun
