Search Results

  1. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    Heaven is the concept of life, by Episcopalian standards. It is, rather than a concious perfection, an eternal state of life and all of it's downfalls, coupled (in my belief) with a certain contentedness. I'm sure you've felt it before, where you sit down with whatever you like most and feel like you don't need anything else in the world.

    WHY DID YOU HAVE TO DRAG ME INTO THIS
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: Discussion
  2. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    Jumping into this knowing nothing about the prior conversation

    BUT

    The way I figure it, if God wanted to give us perfection and full understanding straightaway there's no point in creating existence. God gave us these lives so we could live them, not to wallow in perfection and not have nothing left to do.

    Pls don't murder me because I don't really know what you guys were talking about beforehand I just wanted to get this out there
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: Discussion
  3. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    WELL LET'S GO MAN

    YOUR TERMSa

    EDIT: I think he logged off.

    That was anticlimatic.
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: The Playground
  4. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    [​IMG]
    Thread by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010, 6 replies, in forum: The Spam Zone
  5. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    Post

    Well, KHV

    BUT HE USED PERFECT GRAMMAR AND PUNCTUATION

    HE'S A CODER WHAT IS THISa
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: The Spam Zone
  6. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    What's this? You're complaining about how you don't get challenges anymore?

    DOES THIS SOUND FAMILIAR JADEN
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: The Playground
  7. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    There is no problem with your argument, though there is a problem with Wolfie's. She used the immense amount of scientific evidence (which is defined by science) in favor of science and lack thereof supporting the existance of a God as an attempted offense against theism, as if they were two opposing forces. My point was that this cannot be used against the idea that a God exists because scientific evidence is, quite literally, only existant to support science.
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: Discussion
  8. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    Too bad that he didn't get his slice of the pie in the end.
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: The Spam Zone
  9. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    I fail to see the point in stating that there's a lot of scientific evidence to support science.
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: Discussion
  10. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
  11. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    Profile Post

    Thank you.

    Thank you.
    Profile Post by TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees for Akua WaterDragonKing, Mar 22, 2010
  12. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    Dear christ do want.
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: The Spam Zone
  13. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    So I think this would go better if he just asked her for sex right now.
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: The Spam Zone
  14. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    https://voxli.com/Bears

    Due to the recent outbreak of trolling, we have relocated to a room that can be moderated (at least somewhat).
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: The Spam Zone
  15. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    Well you've got to have a sharp mind to do this stuff at all.
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: The Spam Zone
  16. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    Some pretty cutting edge humor we have going on in this thread.
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: The Spam Zone
  17. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    WE NEED MOAR PEOPLEa
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: The Spam Zone
  18. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    I understand that one explanation is more complex than the other. And I understand that the concept of god is theoretical (rather than hypothetical, "hypothetical" implies a scientific experiment of some kind), however the concept of there not being a god is just as theoretical. And just because one is more complex than the other DOES NOT make it less likely to happen because both are equally theoretical (this is less so as we near Catholocism xD). We could go into Murphy's Law and Rube Goldberg machines and such, but my point is that adding one step to a process whose circumstances you know nothing/next to nothing about does not affect the probability of the scenario.
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: Discussion
  19. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    But your main problem here is that Occam's Razor was intended to choose among conclusions and hypothesis in a scientific experiment. That was its original purpose, not to go about logically supporting or denying anything. There is little to no outside knowledge of God, and therefore Occam's Razor does not work here; if we know nothing about an entity, how do you expect to use such logic as "It is a simpler deduction to make, therefore it is more likely to be the cause to this effect?"
    Post by: TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees, Mar 22, 2010 in forum: Discussion
  20. TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees
    Profile Post

    New duelist, eh?

    New duelist, eh?
    Profile Post by TheMagicalMisterMistoffelees for Alexis, Mar 22, 2010