Search Results

Yeah, but we don't care about them, they can't type about it anyway :D

All rise for the StarCraft II Anthem.

*See OP*

I would laugh and said you're funny, but I know you're serious and it kind of turned me on...

HTML/JavaScript syntax is not subjective. Opinions are.

Ain't nothing like a proper moob hug

I'm all the thunder Sabby will ever need.

Also, Thunder =/= Lightning.

Upvoted .

It doesn't work. Never will.

I was in Voxli, and even that led to problems. Fresh starts don't happen. You can pretend they are fresh starts, but the people are, as Sabby said, subjectively judging others.

And to be frank, I don't see a rift between the members and staff. I see a rift between certain members and staff.

Things are getting out of hand because people are too fucking childish to realize you won't like everything about everything. Sure, there may be some issues on the site, but I'm sure as hell not going to wail on any other members or staff to get it the exact way I want.

I know people on the site don't like me, but I don't give two craps about it, because I simply consider it their problem. I try to avoid being rude towards these members, but of course, I fail sometimes. Thing is, I don't continually keep up a constant bickering, because I finished that in elementary school.

So. Yeah.
Skype groups are fine, but I wouldn't expect anything to be mended, nor would I expect a new start of any sorts.

*Hugs*


Yeah, I know you didn't want it from me.


</3

I'm not for this. I've never had an issue contacting a staff member when needed.

I feel I have to address this;

Quite an unnecessary point to make. It's a very passive-aggressive statement, implying you and "your group" (which I find to be quite humorous to say) don't like the rest of the staff.


It seemed like this thread became somewhat of a back and forth singling out the staff members who happens to be invisible. (Which is the vast minority)

I understand why being invisible is a necessity. Like RvR, I leave my computer on 24/7 and I believe I show as online for 18+ hours a day, even if I only spend a fraction of it actually checking the site.

Isn't it more annoying awaiting a reply from an admin who isn't there, rather than clicking the report button, or to approach another staff member?
Also, from what I can tell, the majority of staff have linked their MSN and/or Skype, so it's really not harder than to add them there, where you actually get an instant reply, if they are indeed online.

It seems as the general idea behind this suggestion, is so that you don't have to make an effort, but would rather prefer staff made it for you.


And in the end, I'd like to say; I do agree with The Fuk?'s post. A mass-pm would be quite handy to have.

Spamming "What's New" until I find something interesting.