Search Results

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Hose it down

Well that's not very nice

Be sure to have sex with them too
Extra marks and ****

Could we just sorta touch penises?

You're all splendid people
Your opinions are valued and nobodies is better or worse then anyone else's.
All threads have a valued place on this forum as do all post

I'm plenty nice, just yesterday I gave a little ant a thumbs up for making it across the sidewalk without getting stomped on

I am a living and breathing Hateocracy
The spreading of ignorance, intolerance and elitism is how I sustain my existence, without it I would become goo.

But Spider-Man's not suppose to be cool
He's a dorky nerd
The whole appeal is that making corny jokes and one liners is exactly what Peter Parker thinks "cool" is.

I don't really see how being forced to do a dangerous job and then dropping into a vat of eels is exactly his fault.

Oh dear god no

Novels tend to be self contained stories made by one writer
Spiders-Man has had a gazillion drillion million different writers over the 52 years he's been around so liberties are always to be expected.

However of course there's still key focal points that should always be contained even in Spidey's stories. You don't make Uncle Ben actually be a villain or something and THEN die, that's just ******ed.

It just got unofficially announced
Give it a day or two

Do you know what would make you happier?
Spreading the seeds of ignorance and hate on internet message boards
I'll start

Spider-Man: bretty gud. Optimistic in comparison to what the 90's did to everything comic related, William Dafoe is one kickass Goblin. Some don't like Tobey's performance but I think he fits the bill as the incredibly lame and nerdy nerd that Parker is

Spider-Man 2: Even better. Really liked what they did with the Doctor Octopus and still has that overall optimistic tone that Sam Raimi seems to love. Some bits are a tad corny (you know the scene I'm talking about).

Spider-Man 3: Kinda bad. Pretty bad in fact. Once again I think a lot of the acting was done well, James Franco, Thomas Church, Topher Grace, all great roles. I liked what they did with Sandman and the scene where he BECOMES Sandman is ****ing kickass. But the movie is really ****ing jumbled. The actress who played Mary Jane(look I don't even remember her name) was laughably boring. Too little Venom for my liking and to be honest the whole "3 villains in one movie" thing is a really delicate process and leads to a lot of structure issues and it shows in this movie. Also THAT scene went on for way too long. Their were better and more subtle ways to show that Peter was becoming a dickbag.

Amazing Spider-Man: Mediocre. The movie screams "cash-in", you can tell that they're just trying to hold on to the Spider-Man license at this point. Acrobatic and web slinging scenes are sweet as hell. Origin story DESTROYS the entire point that Peter Parker was a completely average person turned into a super spider freak thing guy by complete chance. None of the actors really stood out for me but I give them the benefit of the doubt since a lot of them are budding actors anyway. I've gotten FAR too old for teeny bop romances obviously since Peter and Gwen's relationship didn't interest me one bit. The Lizard has 0 presence in the movie and is just kinda there for Spidey to have someone to fight. His goals don't even make any sense.

Amazing Spider-Man 2: Better then the first. The movie STILL screams "cash-in" but the main difference this time being it's basically one big commercial for the next movie. I liked Electro and he had a lot of presence in the movie, I dunno if it was the design or the voice but it just really meshed well with me. Despite that though I will admit he did seem kind of pointless to the overall movie. Like the Lizard in the first movie he's just sorta there for Spidey to have one big spectacular fight with (which was an amazing fight I must say). Once again I'm snoring at the teenybop romance that takes up alot of the film and the origin story once again upsets me and leaves me not caring about it. And to be honest the movie doesn't really make much sense structurally speaking. Things just sorta happen, sometimes it's about Peter and Gwen boning, sometimes it's about Peter figuring out things about his father, sometimes it's about Harry wanting Spiderman's blood to cure him of his bullshit, the movie just jumps all over the place.

Uhhhh
What?
Did you not see the link I just posted? That's the Superman theme
People don't hate the Superman theme, they love it, it's great. It's why it's so memorable.

And what exactly are these bad things about the movies that you mention?
Was it Michael Keaton's performance as Bruce Wayne? I'll admit as Batman it wasn't anything too spectacular but I think as Bruce Wayne he came off as perfect. The scene where he's trying to say that he's Batman but just doesn't know how to articulate himself is one of the best examples of his acting that I can think of right next to Beetlegeuce

Of course Jacky boy steals the show half the time. People can go on and on about Heath Ledger vs Jack Nicholasn but that doesn't really matter to me
At the end of the day Jack is such an entertaining and hilarious character to watch you almost find yourself laughing with all of sick and twisted ****.

The hero villain dynamic is pretty stellar. Some would complain that it's not accurate to the comics at all(what with Joker killing Batmans parents) but I'm happy enough to have seen a new spin on things, especially when overall I think it helps the movie out while not completely ruining the point of said origin story like with Spiderman. I particularly like how the two rivals face eachother in every way possible. Jack vs Batman then Bruce vs Joker and then finally leading up to the climax, Joker vs Batman, fate finally pitting the sworn enemies at eachother. It's an excellent build up and while not on par with Darth Vader vs Luke Skywalker, it's still absolutely great.

And don't even get me started on the soundtrack. Danny Elfman hits it and he hits it hard.

There's a bunch of weird things in the movie that I feel have no place but the movie isn't perfect but nor is any of the movies that you mentioned either.


The point is, I don't know where you're getting this "Everyone ACTUALLY hates it" thing from. These movies ARE remembered fondly, of course there's some of them that AREN'T but that still does not invalidate any of the great ones. And I only covered Batman in this case.