Ever tried Spotify? I don't personally listen to enough different music monthly to ever justify these music provider's services. Spotify was good whilst its trial lasted.
Classically, it has been called firewater. All alcohol has the same boring sensation of dissatisfaction.
I'm playing it now and enjoying it alot. Even though it's a bit rough and outdated for 2014. The first hour is boring, cutscene and tutorial heavy. After that you're into the hub world where you can go on side missions, do odd jobs and collect all sorts of stuff in the crevasses and dark alleyways about the place. Should have a review done by Tomorrow.
You've always been a cartoon character, that's not news.
Aye, I've never wanted to be that kind of guy who hits on women in such a manner that it seems pushy or creepy. I also have the slight look of a creepy to some, in physique and face, and being told that is a kick in the self esteem. Basically, nothing works, we'll all die alone on this forum... together. I do like forward women, to a degree. As long as they don't remind me of my mother in their fierceness, i'll play ball.
Socialisation i'd argue. Women aren't taught to pursue men, in general. The minute a woman tries to flirt with me, I get confused as hell. And then my friends say after 'You know she was flirting with you, right?' i'm dumbfounded. That's more me being shocked someone finds me attractive, but it's generally such a rare thing for guys, we don't process it well. Shame too. But as people get older and their minds become bolder, it's not as rare to see a woman pursuing a guy. But at 21, it's still not all that common.
Good afternoon!
Just adding a point I forgot to do originally, and Patman's use of the idea of 'magic' and religion sparked back that thought. Most atheist I find online are misinformed or stereotyping religious people from a few extremists. They think of them as the puritan extreme that still believe the devil lurks in the woods or that Native Americans are devil people unable to be civilised. Many atheists ignore the modern Christian, for example, who believe in gay marriage, the big bang theory and respect other people's religions. Plenty of scientists too, actually. Christians have throughout history been scientist, inventors and theorists in Europe. Not detracting from the crusades, but science was spurred on by religious curiosity, the search for the reasons God did this or that. Both atheistic and religious people are too easily lumped into groups and are rarely considered as individuals.
I just find it hard to believe a law from 400 years back wouldn't be overturned or reevaluated or that more recent laws supersede it. I mean Britain still has a law about 12 year boys have to train each day with a bow and arrow, legally. But the law is coid because of recent laws that ban offensive weapons and such. Seems a silly law to uphold basically.
Is there actually a large area affected? I find it hard to believe they'd give up public land that easily, especially if you live in a tourist environment.
I generalise because it encompasses all stereotypes, not just the one. At least tattoos are a choice to make, compared to racial or sexist stereotypes, can't stop being a woman or such. But of course jobs should never be considered purely by looks. Meritocracy and such. But I doubt a law against all stereotypes will just stop it happening, and there will always be closed minded people, who lack to see beneath the skin. 7 billion humans. That means a lot of them have got to be idiots. And there will always be idiots.
Inversely then, just because you know a few people who don't fit the mould means nothing too. I know people with tattoos can be as smart as anyone. As much as I know some alcoholics, drug abusers or such to be smart and intelligent. I've watched a couple of prisoner documentaries, one by Louis Theroux about a max security system in Detroit, I believe. He interviewed one criminal, murderer, who during his time in prison read books, learnt history, art, literature and began writing his own books, 7 in his 4 year stint if I remember right. And another, in solitary confinement, multiple murderer and anti social, carved beautiful figures out of soap using his nails. We're all more than one aspect. We're human, generally complex, more so than we sometimes realise in ourselves. Stereotypes are basically group social norms. It's not silly to judge a person by typical traits associated with stereotypes, blonde, loves pink, has false breasts, i'd easily judge that woman to be below average intelligence, love fashion and care more about her looks than most over things, spending thousands on plastic surgery. I'd be welcome to be proven wrong, she may be Oxford educated, read the works or Orwell or anything. But my instincts shouldn't be easily ignored without proof. Deserving aside, we all completely judge one another in one way or another. It's natural instinct, comes with first encounter judgement. I've profiled people, been spot on and completely wrong sometimes, it's all about allowing yourself to take in new info and be proven wrong if the evidence presents itself. We judge others so we can judge what actions to take, it's smart survival and part of being human.
Hmm, depends what you mean by know. In terms of people close-ish at some point or another, I guess, instead of just someone I've met once or twice. My Mum got a tattoo when she was in her 40s. She got it because she wanted, but more precisely, because my grandfather who wouldn't have approved had died a few years back and she felt like could finally get one. Partially, I also believe she was doing it to feel 'young' again. So rebellious and maybe whimsical. My old babysitter and my mum's friend has several, many when she was a teen. She married young, smoked young, took drugs young, had kids young and has gone through more drama than a soap opera. The tattoos she has were not well designed and she regrets not having found a better tattoo artist. Hasty and whimsical. My Dad has several, one with my name and birthdate even. He's tattooed them several times over because of not liking the images or getting bored of them. He also is frivolous with money, wasting money on crap eBay auctions and other things he believes are a deal. He changed cars every year for a while. Whimsical and hasty. One of my classmates at Uni got a tattoo when he was on a mate's holiday abroad, somewhere like Ibiza, but cheaper and more student friendly. His parents never really let him do much when he was younger so for the last couple years he was off the rails with drink, drugs, casual sex. He got dared to have a tat of this face thing with boobs on his back. He was drunk too, when he agreed. Whimsical, hasty, rebellious and i'd like to add idiotic and inebriated to the reasons he got a tattoo. A guy I use to go to school with, and have/had on facebook, apparently got a gang tattoo a couple years back. Not sure what's going on there, but thought i'd mention that. They've all had them because they wanted them. I just analyse their reasoning behind it. I've also seen a lot of documentaries on tattoos, and people get the weirdest stuff for benign reasons. It's a trend in young people especially, I remember one of the documentaries stating 35% of tattooed people in the UK are under the age of 30. Also, in 2010, 25% of under 30 year old Australians had tattoos. Free spirited isn't necessarily good or bad, neither is rebellious, hasty or whimsical in certain amounts. Free spirited people generally lack focus and commitment. I know one girl on my course who has switched between three courses to finally stick on this one because she didn't care and hadn't planned what she wanted to do. She doesn't keep on top of the work and believes that uni work is constraining her creativity at times. She'd rather just read and write what she likes. She has piercings, died hair, tattoos, a penchant for hats and is a regular smoker of marijuana.
With these one liners, you lot could write a cheesy anime.
I can understand the sentiment. Tattoos, especially on young people under the age of 30, generally point to stereotypical behaviour, and can mean they're hasty, whimsical, free spirited or rebellious. Not a science, but I've seen the trend in people with over protected childhoods, coming from peer pressure or even fanaticisms, especially in football fans. Stereotypes don't just come from anywhere, after all. But, basing anyone's characteristics on appearance is not 100% accurate by any means.
Your yuri knows no bounds.
I requested it when we updated the site. We had F5, the banner and the Forums button all pointing towards the forum. The change was useful to just to switch between the two for me, when I was checking news threads and then just switch back if nothing new came up. Not sure why other people cared. Also, it's only the forums page that redirects to Home, everywhere else redirects to forums.
I've seen like the first two hours and I have no care to get into it. It's trying too hard for me and feels badly design. The whole premise of the game is explained in a damned coffin! Also, for a game focused on memory and its effects, there is a damn lot of unexplained reasons for you fighting mutants. I've got it for PS+ too, but I only downloaded it in case I wanted to play, but even that has done nothing for me.
All your section are belong to Krowley!
I no longer wish to be labelled as human. Call me a vampire.
