Whoa buddy...careful.
i'm onto you. :B(: excellent. :B|: practice safe parenthood.
omg...vids. please post here asap.
Hmm...I suppose the periodic revival may be good, but I really feel the game itself should not be altered any further. The alterations made were generally to attract new players and push the current players to be more engaged within the game. Periodic revival will engage the players no matter what, and there would be no reason to actually try to change the game to make it "better" or "easier." Tho...Imo, the original was always more challenging than the latter version. Even I drew sweat from it.
Awe...I'll be gentle next time. :lolface: Promise<3
Dead people turn you on? o.o
I see it.........
Thought you were my mate. :/gasp:
Another year closer to your death.
You sure that's a HE?? o.o
Best suggestion I've heard so far.
Spoiler I will raise my kids right. :B|:
Hasn't the game been milked for all its worth enough? From what I see, the consistent failure of the game comes more from the fact that it's starting to leave a sour taste in the mouth. Granted the fairly new players enjoy it...but 2-3 new players cannot all account for the 10-15 players it generally needs to run good rounds. The larger portion of the players come from the old members, who now have grown tired of the game. Let it be guys. Don't tamper with the lovely "good ending" of the game as we left it. Further alterations will now seriously kill anything that's left.