This be in the wrong section. And a movie? Despite the pleas of this website, Kingdom Hearts isn't the cash-cow of Square. In all respects there wouldn't be a big enough market to profit from the film. Then there's the issue of what the plot would be. Condensing the whole world-hopping bonanza into an hour and a half, give or take a few, would most likely create a tragedy as bad as Jumper. It's good as a game and doing well as a manga, but that's as far as KH should stretch it's limbs at least for now.
Do you have any black in you?....Do you want some? lolololololololololololololololololololololollllol
Name: Jethro Michael Williams the 3rd Age:16 Apperence: Bio: Jethro grew up on the mean streets of the Hidden Sound Village where he learned to scrounge and fight for food. He was never much of a scrapper and instead took to the arts. To him, singing and dancing seemed like a wholesome way out of the dirt he had originally crawled out of. Using his amazing dancing and singing skills he was able to amass a small fortune from street performances to move out of town and settle in a much nicer place. He now attends Naruto and Bleach high school searching it's hallways for little bo- amazing dancers and singers to challenge and defeat Weapons: killer voice and dance moves Powers: Moonwalker magic, the ability to enchant his hat and throw it, and the ability to make his enemies dance themselves to death via said Moonwalker magic. Character: Other.
Yeah but Jovi's so prem he can buy your family.
Whatever we want it to be. There isn't going to be anything more profound to follow this.
Normal is whatever you are comfortable with. Of course there are moral exceptions, but in the context of this debate what is normal does not equal what is moral, nor what is right.
Rap is a business and sex happens to sell to the rabid, hormone-driven masses often referred to as young teens. It's all in how you look at it. Hip hop is actually a wonderful sub-culture with a rich history and vibrant talent. Looking at the negative aspects of it skews your point of view and causes you to generalize (i.e. by calling it all crap). There are two sides to every coin. In Switzerland polution is at a minimum. Gun violence, crime and drug use are virtually non-existent.
YOURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR MOTH3RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRr
Just read the book. Don't waste your money. Don't even bootleg it...just don't watch it. One day Fox will regret picking up every sleazy-hooker-trash script that comes their way. Shouting and whinning doesn't make you a good actor...acting does.
That just implies a relativity about the topic at hand; standards vary and change. The bar exists and at the same time it doesn't, and this all depends on where your looking and how you feel about it. To bring up your earlier example, just as you feel that laws are becoming far too lenient someone can argue that they're too harsh. Why, for example, does Texas think that there is justice in executing criminals?
The demo was really fun. Good for killing some free time.
I really don't think it's possible. Seeing something with the naked eye that can't even be detected with devices with higher resolution and reception doesn't seem possible-- it defies our physiology. At most the worst we've ever encountered with faulty neural and optic wiring is synesthesia, where people have seen sound. Even more so it all depends if you even believe in ghosts or the supernatural to begin with. In my opinion it's just as much a fantasy as psychics and palm reading.
My name backwards is Jesus Christ.
Esteemed recognition among the academic community in the field of psychology.
If you have an mp3 phone and a copy of the song the skies the limit.
Another issue comes from a lack of communication. People already come into these arguments with their mind made up on information and beliefs whether or not they are true. Jehova's Witnesses aren't so bad if you actually listen to them. Of course you'll come across the odd extremist that blames the devil for everything wrong with the world, etc. but most of the people that come to your door simply ask for your take on the matter. If you're not interested they move on. From personal experience I like to take the time to talk with my single-serving religious visitors to clarify and advocate for not only the other side of the debate, but the gray areas in between.
Well society's standards change with those that contribute to it. Granted there is always decay of what we consider society, but the bar is subject to the people at a specific time. Many things that were once thought to be social taboos are now acceptable. In focusing purely on whatever we can find and deem as corruption we end up blowing some issues into something much bigger. Take the current crusade against video games. Con-advocates place violence in them as a rip in the moral fabric of society, when the kink in the chain starts much earlier.
Frustrated, yes. But I never harbour violent thoughts towards my gaming hardware.
Well this still implies nothing more than that we have a choice in the matter. To play is to be conscientious of the fact that you are doing so, and thus you control how involved you become. There is definitely a social phenomenon at work when a person socializes more on an mmorpg than in face-to-face meetings. Whether it is good or bad is a matter of debate. It's obvious that their needs for interaction are being met through another medium, so would calling it a "condition" or "psychological issue" really be right? As always there are those that take it too far and engage in a mindless, gaming stupor- of course chances are there's more wrong with them than just being addicted to a game; they could be high in situation anxiety, avoidance, and a multitude of other traits.
A lot of people do pick the best of both worlds, so to speak. The debate has never had to be as narrowed-minded as almost every forum on the internet has made it out to be. The best example that comes to mind is the view that evolution is in fact a form of intelligent design. It's unfortunate that most people come to the table with such extreme points of view when both are wielded by those even thought to be lunatics by their own colleagues at times. You're a fool if you believe that you can disprove a god, or that science hasn't merited anything.
