Search Results

Search Again

Thread
I saw this great porno

Its about a wild zebra in new york city who meets a hooker with a heart of gold i dont want to give away the ending but its a heart breaker. Man they do all the time thou, like every other scene. gre

Thread by: Scrotumz!, Dec 1, 2007, 0 replies, in forum: Movies & Media
Post
What superpower would you like to have?

I'd Have the ability to create black holes with my rectum

Also water and ice are the same thing genius.

Post by: Scrotumz!, Dec 1, 2007 in forum: Discussion
Thread
Hey! they bleeped out my word sence when is A N A L a bad word?

A N A L
F U C K
E P I D I D Y M U S

Thread by: Scrotumz!, Dec 1, 2007, 0 replies, in forum: Discussion
Thread
**** Fornication

I'm up for it...... who else

Thread by: Scrotumz!, Dec 1, 2007, 0 replies, in forum: Discussion
Post
Creationism vs Evolution

Repliku said: ↑

First off, that link is a lame thing and he has it wrong. Some of what he wrote is absolute dribble, though fancied up to look legitimate. Also, those who said it was a scam are correct. In simple, you can -never- argue logic with someone who is of absolute faith. It cannot win ever! If Christian zealots were to actually study the theories before them instead of taking the word of some stupid idiot that does not know them himself, well, we might get somewhere in this debate. I find it disturbing that even the Creationist supporters here do not know what the Big Bang Theory truly is, and yet many of us who support Evolution can take quotes from the Bible and understand them perfectly fine. Creationism scientists lie. Until someone actually looks at the Theories and doesn't just read a one-sided view, there is no way to talk with these people at all. It's like they are afraid to view the truth of what is 'really' written in theories of science, but they are so candidly motivated to pass scientists a Bible. Then we read it and go 'wtf'. At least scientists actually -read- it and study it. I have yet to see a proper study done by a Creationist and I doubt I will ever see it done. I can better debate Intelligent Design versus Evolution because both come to paths of agreement and some realism, even if 'faith' is tacked on the end for ID.

Logic is rationalizing out, studying, ****yzing and critically examining and thinking about things. It is not perfect but with the minds of many people doing so and tangible evidence, things do happen. Science is diverse though and so there are more than one theory on nearly any topic, because there are different ways with evidence to look at something. It's how Objective versus how Subjective we will be when examining things before our eyes. Objective is taking in the information and Subjective is how we perceive it and ideas that formulate around them.

Science does NOT answer all questions. As a scientist, one of the little things you do in your life is understand that you will not have all the answers to every single question and some must be left "open-ended" to be researched later or by other people in the future. Science does not go out of its way to say God doesn't exist except to point out to Christians that it WILL not exist in a "Science" research because it is something that cannot possibly be studied until we reach that point. We take -real- things, look at them. Science moves around 'Faith' because Faith does not study anything. It sees what it is told to see and what it puts in its heart to believe. Science does not, despite every zealot Christian's fear, go out of its way to say God doesn't exist and the only reason it has a problem with religion is because of issues with dating, discoveries that contradict the books in events, and we study farther than a few doctrines can ever reach.

Christian Science is a farce and should be eliminated from the realm of science altogether. It's like saying Scientology is science and it is clearly not. You cannot go into science with the point of proving something exists that you already believe in and learning things of science incorrectly to form views and solidify your faith. If the material is corrupted from the beginning, ALL results will therefore be corrupted and all this is in the end is a 'reaffirming' of someone's personal faith by skewing evidence and lying. You don't need that to believe in a religion, I would hope, but that IS what Christian Science is about.

Science is studying that which is around us and using the 5 senses. It is critical views of what is there to be noticed and what does it mean, its function, its purpose and how can it be used, altered etc. It is not going to answer solidly about God because it is something someone either believes in or does not. Atheists disbelieve in God. So, many atheists are scientists. Not all are. So, some Christians, Jews, Islamic followers are Scientists. Not all support Creationism or even support Christian Science. I know several Christians that support the Theory of Evolution and other things that 'contradict' the Bible. I work with them in archeology and learn from some of them. The studies of science are meant to come from as -neutral- of a mind as you can be and to put personal beliefs and your own 'theories' to the side line so you can investigate things with an open mind: Not a closed one which is what Christian Science does. Science itself will not go out of its way to disprove OR prove God because quite simply we do not have the answers yet to do so. However, we can study matter, atoms, water, molecules, genetics, the galaxies, black holes, wormholes, entanglement, quantum physics, biology, botany etc. No text book that kids ever read says "There is no God". It will not happen regardless of what some scientists believe because that is a personal opinion and there is no evidence. It is also a personal opinion that God exists.

Just because something marvelous exists and we study it and go 'wow' doesn't mean a -true- scientist is going to just say that "God did it" because the answer to that is unknown and to say so corrupts the work done by many people to maintain a neutral point of saying 'this is how it works in the present time and this is how it worked formerly'. ANYONE can say -anything- they find was created by God and will make some reason for it to have been possible. I can also at the same time say the Pink Puffy Jellyfish made the Milky Way Galaxy and is now sending our galaxy on a path with meeting the Andromeda Galaxy. I also can have as much 'evidence' as what extreme Christians do when they say God did it.

If I went to some meeting on the Theory of Evolution and said "The Pink Puffy Jellyfish" is responsible for all the miraculous universe and our existences, I'd be laughed out of there because I have made it a personal belief and no one else is going to believe that, even if I convince some colleagues and start a "cult". If I went to a Christian Science get together and did the same thing, I would be called blasphemous, but what makes my Pink Puffy Jellyfish any less real than God is when saying there is a Divine Creator? I too can write a book and say I was divinely inspired. All cults/religions start out that way. This is WHY exactly that the Bible can be studied for some Historic quality but other than that, it is not so accurate for much else. The only evidence of God is that there are a few books out there and a mass culture of people that 'believe' in it. This is -not- proof. The Christians of the past made sure to wipe out mythologies of Greek, Egyptian, Roman, Norse and Celtic ideals (and more) and to absorb some of their holidays and designs even to make more people believe but what makes God anymore real than Thor? If Thor is now just reduced to being of the status of a mythology, why should we treat God any different? Just because people 'believe' it does not make it true. Someday Science may have the ability to prove whether God exists, or whether Thor exists or if either ever truly existed. However, it is simply not to that point yet and as there is very little evidence to support things either way, we are caught at an impasse and most scientists will not even bother with that and instead focus on what is -real- and there to be studied. Evolution has tangible evidence you can hold in your hand and therefore it is examined and studies continue. The point is to not say whether it was created by God or not, but to say THERE it is and it exists! Someday this will be understood because this war between belief and logic has gone on for hundreds of years and killed many great people who dared to think outside of the bun.

P.S. Thank you Mirai for doing what I debated on doing and taking apart that Hovind article. I didn't want this post to be anymore of a novel than it already is.
Click to expand...

That was the longest post i've ever not read. Seriously man no one actually CARES if they did they would just talk to each other about they'd do something.

Post by: Scrotumz!, Dec 1, 2007 in forum: Debate Corner
Post
All Peace and No War?

I pooped out a nickel and i'm giving it to charity!

Post by: Scrotumz!, Dec 1, 2007 in forum: Debate Corner
Thread
I pooped out a nickel and i'm giving it to charity!

I pooped out a nickel and i'm giving it to charity!

The pope would be proud of me

Thread by: Scrotumz!, Dec 1, 2007, 0 replies, in forum: Discussion
Post
Woman to be given 40 lashes over teddy bear

You guyz there is a part of the story that you're missing...
The teddy bear IS Muhammad!

Also all yall ******ed you can't talk and critisize a whole culture over matters that have nothing to do with you
You say "will they ever learn" as thou your enlightened. I'm not condoning their actions i'm just saying shut up

Post by: Scrotumz!, Nov 30, 2007 in forum: Current Events
Post
What is the point of life?

GUYZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
the point of life is to be kind to one another and occasionally have sex with animals

Post by: Scrotumz!, Nov 30, 2007 in forum: Discussion

Showing results 1 to 9 of 9

Search Again